Roger-
No action from Revcom should be necessary since the main standard is actively under revision. Be that as it may, your slide set might well be useful if any questions arise.
Geoff
Jon,
We don't need to extend a PAR. The request is going to RevCom, not NesCom. The extension is required to bypass the rule limiting standards to three amendments. With the extension, we'll be allowed to complete 802.16s as the fourth amendment soon, with the revision to follow next year.
On May 15, 2017, 7:44 PM +0200, Jon Rosdahl < jrosdahl@ieee.org>, wrote:
Roger,
I have added it to the agenda, and the agenda file will be posted shortly.
I would like to ask/comment:
Your Revision PAR expires 31-Dec-2021
So your Revision PAR does not need an extension.
Your 16s PAR expires: 31-Dec-2020
So it does not need an extension.
It would seem perfectly normal for your group to complete the 16s and then roll it into the revision project.
So What extension are you asking the EC to vote on?
Jon
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
|