Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] 802.11 Responses to Comment on 802.11 Revision PAR

Jon:

Thanks for considering the 802.3 comment, and answering "Yes" to 6.1.b.  You didn't though fill in the field "If yes, please explain;".  Something like "The RAC reviewed the 2016 revision, but it may want to review for correct and consistent usage of registry terms." would make the RAC Chair happy (personal opinion, not an 802.3 recommendation).

--Bob

---- Jon Rosdahl <jrosdahl@ieee.org> wrote: 
> Greetings,
>    the 802.11 WG approved the responses to the comments received on the
> 802.11 Revision PAR which are contained in slides 16-19 of doc 11-17/253r2:
> https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/17/11-17-0253-02-0PAR-par-review-meeting-agenda-and-comment-slides-vancouver-2017.pptx
> 
> An updated PAR is shown in 11-17/0004r2:
> https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/17/11-17-0004-02-0000-revision-par-proposal-tgmd.doc
> 
> Thanks for the comments,
> Regards,
> Jon
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Rosdahl                 Engineer, Senior Staff
> office: 801-492-4023      Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
> cell:   801-376-6435      10871 North 5750 West
>                                    Highland, UT 84003
> 
> A Job is only necessary to eat!
> A Family is necessary to be happy!!
> 
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.