Re: [802SEC] 802.15 Responses to Comments on 15.13 PAR (aka 15.11)/CSD
Bob:
The PAR is much improved! (Though I'm not personally happy with all responses, not sure what the reaction of others in 802.3 will be. The new PAR has a few editorial things that if updated might avoid NesCom comment.
5.2 -- Scope will be in the standard, and IEEE style is that five digit numbers have the thousand separator being a space, not a comma (10 000 instead of 10,000). The proper abbreviation is Gb/s rather than Gbits/s (also in Purpose).
5.4 -- This now is the first occurrence of RF. It is expanded in 5.5, but should be expanded on first use.
6.1.b -- Missing comma after CID. As RAC Chair, I'd support not having to expand acronyms for RAC products, the Yes field is really a note to the RAC and staff who won't be confused. Think about if you want to fix now of only if NesCom members comment.
8.1 -- First use acronyms should be expanded: MIMO, IR, UV, possibly WLAN (or replace WLAN with 802.11).
--Bob
---- Bob Heile <bheile@ieee.org> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Attached are 4 docs: the comment resolution PPT, the revised PAR and CSD
> and a CSD redline. Please let me know if you have comments or questions.
>
> Regards
>
> Bob
>
>
> Bob Heile, Ph.D
>
> Director of Standards, Wi-SUN Alliance
> Chair, IEEE 802.15 Working Group on Wireless Specialty Networks
> Chair IEEE 2030.5 Working Group for Smart Energy Profile 2
> Co-Chair IEEE P2030 Task Force 3 on Smartgrid Communications
>
> 11 Robert Toner Blvd, Suite 5-301
> North Attleboro, MA 02763 USA
> Mobile: +1-781-929-4832
> email: bheile@ieee.org
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.