James,
I would like to propose a change to the OM.
8.2.2(a) says “Sponsor subgroup communications with government bodies shall not be released without prior approval by 75% of the Sponsor subgroup.” Strictly speaking, this requires that 75% of the subgroups members have voted to approve. However, I think that many WGs interpret it more casually and simply check for 75% approval in a vote. I would prefer to remove any ambiguity. Here are two solutions:
(1) .. without prior approval of at least 75% of all the members of the Sponsor subgroup
(2) .. without prior approval by an action of the Sponsor subgroup, per the “Approval of an Action” requirements of IEEE Project 802 LMSC Working Group Policies and Procedures, with a 75% approval threshold
I prefer (2).
Roger
On 2016Jun 20, at 11:56 PM, James P. K. Gilb <gilb@ieee.org> wrote:
All
The 30 day window for suggesting changes to the WG P&P and/or OM is here.
So far, I only have these changes to the WG P&P:
At the end of 6.0, delete the "j" sitting on a line by itself.
In 4.2.3, "as described in 4.1.1.2 Retention" should be "as described in 4.2.2"
So, if you have any more, please have an EC member propose them.
There are some discussions of proposed additions and changes to the Chair's Guidelines. These do not have a submission time limit.
James Gilb
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.