Dear 802.11 members,
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEEE 802.11 Working Group Ballot Result
|
on the question
|
'Should P802.11ah D5.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?'
|
|
|
|
Ballot Number:
|
|
215
|
Ballot Group:
|
|
TGah
|
Ballot Opened:
|
|
2015-09-18
|
Ballot Closed:
|
|
2015-10-03
|
Duration of ballot (days):
|
|
15
|
Pool (eligible voters):
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
Votes Received
|
|
|
Approve
|
|
262
|
Disapprove
|
|
6
|
Disapprove without comment (invalid)
|
|
2
|
Abstain
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
Total returns
|
|
285
|
Returns as % of pool:
|
|
86.36
|
Return requirement:
|
|
> 50%
|
Is number of returns sufficient?
|
|
The >50% return requirement has been met
|
|
|
|
Abstains as % of returns:
|
|
5.26
|
Abstain requirement:
|
|
< 30%
|
Is number of abstains sufficiently small?
|
|
The 30% abstain requirement has been met
|
|
|
|
Approval rate as % of valid returns:
|
|
97.76
|
Approval requirement:
|
|
>= 75%
|
Is number of approve votes sufficient?
|
|
The 75% approval requirement has been met
|
|
|
|
Result:
|
|
Motion passes
|
Number of comments received:
|
|
1
|
The one comment was from a “yes” voter, and was withdrawn (by email to me) after the ballot closed.
I see no reason for TGah to need to meet together to “approve” a “rejected. Commenter indicates he has withdrawn this comment.”
resolution from a “yes” voter. TGah has met the terms of the IEEE 802 EC’s conditional approval, and will proceed to sponsor ballot
as quickly as possible.
Best Regards,
Adrian P STEPHENS
Tel: +44 (1793) 404825 (office)
Tel: +1 (971) 330 6025 (mobile)
----------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.