| John:
I have to question the wisdom in creating a separate database of standards and projects when those two lists are easily accessed in myProject. The only thing I observe you have included that isn’t in the PAR/Standard Report is the amendments that are part of a revision. If we want to make the information available on our web site, it should simply be a copy of what is in myProject, not a separate database.
Having noted that, I would note the following discrepancies on 802.1 and 802.3:
P802.1AB revision no on your list P802.1Qca amendment not on your list P802.1ASbt since it is withdrawn, it shouldn’t be on your list, it isn’t an active project
P802.3bw you have listed as a new standard, it is an amendment
You noted RAC Required on Std 802, but not on other projects (the RAC is a mandatory coordination for any standard and RAC review is triggered by the PAR, by MEC or by RAC request so I find no value in that additional information).
—Bob
A couple corrections I found:
802.15.4-2011 did not include 802.15.4e-2012. (row 10) 802.15.4 rev B (row 11) contains also 802.15.4p 802.15,4-2011 / Cor1 - needs status updated (rolled into current revision?) Ben All, Everyone is requested to review the database for accuracy and follow-up with Mr. Nikolich to address any issues. Regards, John D’Ambrosia Recording Secretary, IEEE 802 LMSC
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
|