Re: [802SEC] updated DSRC Tiger Team timeline and action item status

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Pleas also address the comments on how the report is referenced in the motion. It needs to refer to exactly the report that we are going to send.

“with the sections with no consensus within 802.18 removed” doesn’t tell me which sections are going to be removed. Best would be to post a copy of the document as you intend to send it and reference that version of the doc in the motion.

A motion can be split if the two portions of the motion can each stand on their own. It doesn’t seem likely that we would send the report without a cover letter to provide context for it so it probably shouldn’t be split.

The way you have it now, each bullet says Move to approve which sounds like separate motions. If we are approving sending a cover letter and report in one motion, it would be

IEEE 802 LMSC Executive Committee approves sending to the FCC:

· The cover letter in document <document number> and

· The DSRC Tiger Team report in document <document number>

Regards,

Pat

From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Michael Lynch
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:20 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] updated DSRC Tiger Team timeline and action item status

Paul,

From the comments that I have seen there seem several options.

1. Two separate motions, one for the cover letter and one for forwarding the report, either truncated or not. There doesn't seem to a consensus on sending both.

2. A single motion to forward only a letter that says while we tried the participants could not agree hence there is no report stating the outcome of the TT.

It would also be useful if commenters would remember that what has been sent out is simply a draft towards the final motion(s) and not a motion to be balloted on as yet.

I would like to have any further thoughts or comments so that I can send the EC the proposed motion for review prior to leaving for Europe on business next Tuesday morning. IMHO the only thing that is clear is that there could be two, or only one, motion for the EC to consider. Also proposed text for the Sponsor's letter to the FCC would be useful.

Best regards,

Mike

Sent from my Windows 8.1 Phone

From: Paul Nikolich
Sent: ‎4/‎10/‎2015 17:12
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] updated DSRC Tiger Team timeline and action item status

Dear EC Members,

I updated the DSRC Tiger Team time-line to include reference to the 07FEB2014 letter 802 sent to the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology that provided background and status information on the Tiger Team activity (https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/15/ec-15-0030-00-00EC-18-14-0007-02-dsrc-status-to-fcc.pdf).

The pending FCC communication must be consistent with the 07FEB2014 letter, as it will be a follow up to that communication. I am not aware of any other formal written communication 802 has had with the FCC on this topic--if there has been, please provide them to me and let the EC know immediately.

Mike Lynch, what is the plan to address the Roger's, James' and Steve's comments? It's been almost a month since the closing EC, let's get this item closed.

Regards,

--Paul

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.