| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Mike, May I suggest making an R2 from the R1 version and removing Appendix D, which is not references in the main report. If we have that available before the call then I think there will be support
for it in 802.18. Thanks, Steve From: Michael Lynch [mailto:MJLynch@mjlallc.com] Rich and Steve, From: Shellhammer, Steve Rich, The motion I attempted to make at the EC, before the original motion was pulled, was to remove Appendix D from the report since it was only referenced from Section 11 which was removed by 802.18
and was also never reviewed by the Tiger Team. In addition, that Appendix takes a position different from that of the IEEE members, as we saw in the straw polls run in the 802.11 Regulatory Standing committee. Removing this Appendix was missed during the
802.18 meeting due to lack of time. Regards, Steve From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org]
On Behalf Of Rich Kennedy As I explained in the EC meeting, I was told that Steve Shellhammer was going to ask to have the two orphaned references removed, so I prepare a version r1 just to have ready in case he did. I know it was not approved
in 802.18, but the initial EC motion should have been the r0, with the r1 waiting for Shellhammer’s request. I did not even suggest you motion r1 because r1 was not the version approved in 802.18. Rich Kennedy Manager, New Technology Development (832) 298-1114 Wi-Fi Alliance Spectrum & Regulatory TG Chair Wi-Fi Alliance White Spaces TTG Chair Wi-Fi Alliance White Spaces MTG Vice-chair IEEE802.11 TGaf (WLAN in White Spaces) Chair IEEE802.11/15 Regulatory SC Chair IEEE 802.11/18 Liaison From: Michael Lynch [mailto:MJLynch@mjlallc.com]
Rich, From: Rich Kennedy Mike: We completed the action in 802.18. The modified document was approved 8/1/1. There is no additional action required in your group. I have provided the EC with a written version of the explanation of this issue that should have proceeded the EC motion. I don’t know what you want 802.18 to do. Did you intend to send this to the 802.18 reflector? Rich Kennedy Manager, New Technology Development (832) 298-1114 Wi-Fi Alliance Spectrum & Regulatory TG Chair Wi-Fi Alliance White Spaces TTG Chair Wi-Fi Alliance White Spaces MTG Vice-chair IEEE802.11 TGaf (WLAN in White Spaces) Chair IEEE802.11/15 Regulatory SC Chair IEEE 802.11/18 Liaison From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org]
On Behalf Of Michael Lynch Dear all, As you are may be aware during the Berlin Plenary meeting we were unable to move the DSRC report forward for EC approval. The purpose of this conference call will be to determine
what should be forwarded to the EC for their consideration. At the time of the closing EC meeting it wasn’t clear what 802.18 would ask the EC to review and vote on. On 3/13/15 there was a further revision proposed which 802.18 never had the opportunity to
review. Additionally since the end of the Berlin meeting there has been a further proposal for modification of the Tiger Team’s DSRC report. The purpose of this conference call is to complete the review in 802.18. The intended result of that review is a vote to approve a motion to the EC on the results of the Tiger
Team’s DSRC report. The EC can then determine, by email ballot, whether to forward the Tiger Team’s DSRC report to the FCC. The call is planned for 10:00 a.m. Central time on 4/8/15. Bridge details will be published during the week prior to the conference call. Best regards, Mike ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
|