Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hello Steve, The issue I have with this is that the purpose of an 802 WG’s Study Group is to create a PAR (and CSD). This is not a study group for that purpose, but for a bunch of other admirable
purposes. It is reasonable for a WG’s Study Group to be able to write a PAR and CSD in 6 months, and the IEEE-SA rules mention that figure. I’m not sure it is reasonable for the group this
proposes to be limited the same way. The obvious rejoinder is that I was there and voted to approve the study group, so I should have said my piece then. Nevertheless, I believe we should discuss at the next EC meeting the purpose of this group and determine
whether it fits within the definition of a WG’s study group, or needs to be called (and follow the rules for) something else. Best Regards, Adrian P STEPHENS Tel: +44 (1793) 404825 (office) Tel: +1 (408) 2397485 (mobile, USA) ---------------------------------------------- From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org]
On Behalf Of Shellhammer, Steve EC, At the November Plenary the EC approved formation of the 802.19 study group on Coexistence in Unlicensed Bands (CUB). At the time we had not prepared a press release. We have now done that. Before running an electronic ballot on this I would like to give the EC a few days to look it over and see if there are any editorial comments on the draft. Please take a few minutes to look this over and send me any comments you might have. This has already been reviewed and edited by the IEEE staff. Thanks, ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
|