James,
I am inclined to approve however that is dependent on the answer to a question.
On Slide 4 the first bullet says "Get a motion in a minimum of 2 IEEE 802 WGs (not TAGs) that express support for adding this application category and that they will be active participants."
Why is the participation in this process of an existing TAG, such as 802.18, disallowed?
Regards,
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of James P. K. Gilb
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 18:44
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] +++ 10-day EC Email Ballot +++ Scope change of IEEE 802.24 and process for adding Task Groups for new areas of interest
Dear EC members
Paul has delegated the conduct of the EC electronic ballot on the following motion to me.
This motion is taken under the normal process for approving EC actions and according to 7.1.1, item a) "Formation or modification of a subgroup, including its procedures, scope, and duties" requires a majority vote of those responding.
Moved: IEEE 802 Executive Committee approves the new scope of the IEEE
802.24 Vertical Applications TAG and the process for approving new work withing the TAG as described in document 24-14-0016-01-0000-TG-creation-process.pdf.
Moved: Gilb, Seconded: D'Ambrosia
Start of ballot: Thursday, 22 May 2014
Close of ballot: Sunday, 1 June 2014, 11:59 pm AOE.
For your convenience, I have attached the document.
James Gilb
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.