Re: [802SEC] Proposed compatibility requirement for CSD/5C

["James P. K. Gilb" <gilb@ieee.org>]

Jon

I would love to have better wording that achieves the same result.

James Gilb

On 03/19/2013 10:27 AM, Jon Rosdahl wrote:
> I can live with that rationale for leaving it in...but that paragraph
> does read a bit rough though.
> Jon
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Heile" <bheile@ieee.org>
> To: "Jon Rosdahl" <jrosdahl@ieee.org>; <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] Proposed compatibility requirement for CSD/5C
>
>
> > Jon
> >
> > I will just offer that if we remove this sentence, then 15.4, for
> > every PAR it does, is subjected to an endless (or boilerplate)
> > response as to why it can not comply. This at least puts the reason in
> > one place, one time, and does not make work which offers no value add.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > At 09:27 AM 3/19/2013 -0600, Jon Rosdahl wrote:
> > > I think that this wording is ok up to the point of the "exception"
> > > paragraph.
> > > I think that that paragraph is not necessary.
> > > FWIW,
> > > Jon
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "James P. K. Gilb" <gilb@ieee.org>
> > > To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> > > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 8:03 AM
> > > Subject: [802SEC] Proposed compatibility requirement for CSD/5C
> > >
> > >
> > > > All
> > > >
> > > > Based on feedback, I have some updated wording to consider for the
> > > > compatibility requirement for the CSD/5C.  This would replace the
> > > > existing text.
> > > >
> > > > --------------------
> > > > All IEEE 802 standards should be in conformance with IEEE Std 802,
> > > > IEEE 802.1D, and IEEE 802.1Q. If any variances in conformance
> > > > emerge, they shall be thoroughly disclosed and reviewed with IEEE
> > > > 802.1 Working Group prior to submitting a PAR to the Sponsor.
> > > >   a) Will the proposed standard comply with IEEE Std 802, IEEE Std
> > > > 802.1D and IEEE Std 802.1Q?
> > > >   b) If the answer to a) is no, supply the response from the IEEE
> > > > 802.1 Working Group.
> > > >
> > > > An exception to this procedure is made for variances that occur due
> > > > to the use of EUI-64 addresses in proposed standards that require
> > > > EUI-64 addresses to maintain backward compatibility with existing
> > > > IEEE 802 standards.
> > > > ---------------------
> > > >
> > > > Comments/suggestions?
> > > >
> > > > James Gilb
> > > >
> > > > ----------
> > > > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> > > > This list is maintained by Listserv.
> > >
> > > ----------
> > > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> > > This list is maintained by Listserv.
> >
> >
> > Bob Heile, Ph.D
> > Chairman Emeritus & Chief Technologist, ZigBee Alliance
> > Chair, IEEE 802.15 Working Group on Wireless Personal Area Networks
> > Co-Chair IEEE P2030 Task Force 3 on Smartgrid Communications
> > 11 Robert Toner Blvd
> > Suite 5-301
> > North Attleboro, MA  02763   USA
> > Mobile: +1-781-929-4832
> > email:   bheile@ieee.org
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.