Re: [802SEC] Comments received on 802.15.4q
Bob,
There was comments from 802.11 that
were in the file I posted to the Reflector.
I acknowledge my error in the cover letter not
pointing out that it was in the referenced document.
Here are the comments from doc 11-12-1223r0 that
was posted and sent to the SEC reflector at 3:46pm CT.
802.11 comments to 802.15.4q:
5C ? 3a ? Suggests that some existing 15.4 devices can
operate with coin cell batteries.
This would imply that the existing standard is sufficient for building
compliant devices operating with coin cell batteries.
Q: Why do you need a new Standard? How is it ?unique? from the existing
standard?
5C ? 3a seems to infer that the problem being solved is
related to pulse current, while
3b suggests the problem is average current.
Q: What is the actual
problem?
As you can see, it is a couple of clarification questions that
the group would like a response on.
Thanks,
Jon
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 7:35
PM
Subject: [802SEC] Comments received on
802.15.4q
> All-
>
> I received a comment from Paul Nikolich on
15.4q
>
> Regards
>
> Bob
>
>
>
Bob Heile, Ph.D
> Chairman, ZigBee Alliance
> Chair, IEEE 802.15
Working Group on Wireless Personal Area Networks
> Co-Chair IEEE P2030
Task Force 3 on Smartgrid Communications
> 11 Robert Toner Blvd
>
Suite 5-301
> North Attleboro, MA 02763 USA
>
Mobile: +1-781-929-4832
> email: bheile@ieee.org
>
>
----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.