Re: [802SEC] Rules issue on Procedure for PARs

["James P. K. Gilb" <gilb@ieee.org>]

Pat

I think we should remove it.

If we don't, then probably the best place to track it is to add it to 
the 5C, which I have porposed that we update in November.

James Gilb

On 10/12/2012 04:51 PM, Pat Thaler wrote:
> In working on text for the RFC on how IEEE and IETF work together, I
> noticed that the second paragraph of 11.2 of the Operations Manual
> (the subclause on 802 approval of PARs) says that PARs are to be
> accompanied by "a work plan for the development of managed object
> definitions, either as part of the PAR or as part of an additional
> PAR".
>
> I haven't seen any PARs accompanied by such a work plan (beyond some
> PARs having the words "managed objects" in their scope). Looking at
> recently approved PARs, there are PARs that don't include even that.
>
> Should we remove this requirement since we aren't enforcing it?
>
> Regards, Pat
>
> ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.