Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[802SEC] Informing other bodies of our proposed PARs

We discussed during the EC teleconference whether posting a pointer to PARs on the IETF new-work reflector is a liaison statement which requires a motion or not. Some felt strongly that it does and others equally strongly that it doesn’t. We have a similar request from another standards body (was it ITU?).

 

The form of email would be something like:

 

The following Project Authorization Requests are under consideration for the <month> <year> IEEE 802 Plenary:

A list of <designation>-<title>

 

The PARs can be found at http://ieee802.org/PARs.shtml.

 

Any comments on a proposed PAR should be sent to the Working Group chair identified in the PAR to be received by <date of Tuesday of the plenary> 1700 <time zone of meeting>.

 

At this point, I can see two courses of action –

A motion to give blanket approval to a regular liaison mailing of the information above to IETF (and possibly include the other body)

 

Or

A motion to acknowledge that the above communication is not a formal liaison and doesn’t require approval.

 

I’d like input on which would be preferred.

 

Pat

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.