| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
My apologies - slight error in the reported stats on the WG vote on the motion (but not in the outcome). Should have read: The ballot achieved a response of 50-0-0, which represents a response rate of 77% and an approval rate of 100%. Regards, Tony On 29 May 2012 22:47, Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk> wrote: > EC colleagues - > > P802.1Q Corrigendum 2 completed its initial Working Group ballot at the > beginning of May with 100% approval and no outstanding disapprove comments. > The stats were: > > Category Total Percentage > > Yes 32 100.00% No 0 0.00% Abstain 5 11.36% No. of Voters 66 100.00% Voters > responding 44 66.67% > I have since conducted an email ballot of the working group on the > following motion: > > "802.1 requests permission from the EC to forward P802.1Q Corrigendum 2 to > Sponsor ballot." > > WG Proposed: Parsons, seconded: Thaler > > The ballot achieved a response of 37-0-0, which represents a response rate > of 77% and an approval rate of 100%. > > Paul has delegated the conduct of a 10-day EC ballot on the above motion, > proposed by Jeffree, seconded by Thaler. The closing date of the ballot is > therefore set as 8th June 2012 AOE; as per current P&P I will terminate the > ballot earlier if it becomes apparent that the question has been decided. I > would appreciate earlyresponses, as that will allow us to complete the > Sponsor ballot in good time for the July Plenary. > > Regards, > Tony > > ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.