Re: [802SEC] Closing agendas posted and attached

["James P. K. Gilb" <gilb@ieee.org>]

Mike

You had asked, but if one person objects, it needs to be removed from 
the consent agenda.  I objected because the EC was notified only a few 
hours before the meeting of these documents and I did not have time to 
review them in time.

I personally would like at least 48 hours for any document on the 
consent agenda as Thursday is a busy day for me.

James Gilb

On 03/16/2012 03:35 PM, MJLynch@mjlallc.com wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I had asked for 802.18 docs 0028, 0031, 0032 and 0033 to be on the consent agenda. The first three are simply continuing business between 802.16 and ITU-R WP5D. Indeed those three only concern 802.16. Doc .18-12-0033 is a further 802 input opposing Progeny's operation in the 902 - 928 MHz frequency band. We have been opposing Progeny in that band going back to the time prior to my becoming the 802.18 chair in 2005. There wouldn't seem to be anything controversial about any of this. Can they please be moved to the consent agenda?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of James P. K. Gilb
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 5:18 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [802SEC] Closing agendas posted and attached
>
> All
>
> Here it is, usual formats.
>
> Lisa and Dawn, please print this version.
>
> James Gilb
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.