Re: [802SEC] Results of EC ballot on Liaison letter to SC6
Bruce,
In accordance with my ballot comment, I agree.
Roger
Roger B. Marks <roger@consensii.com>
Consensii LLC <http://consensii.com>
<http://linkedin.com/in/rogermarks>
On 2012/01/10, at 12:41 AM, Law, David wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> In response to you request for further feedback from the EC - I support the changes suggested by Geoff - particularly in respect to changing 'MAC address registry agreements' to 'registry agreements'.
>
> Best regards,
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Kraemer
> Sent: 09 January 2012 19:46
> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] Results of EC ballot on Liaison letter to SC6
>
> Geoff,
> Thanks for the suggestions - and I am personally comfortable with them.
> I'd like to see some further feedback from the EC Note: we have a JTC1 committee meeting next week in Jacksonville we can use for a discussion forum.
>
> Also note that the baseline document we voted on has been sent to SC6 and posted by Jooran - hence we have successfully met the Guangzhou meeting posting deadline.
> If we get some positive feedback from the EC on these revisions what we can do is either post to Sc6 a revision or carry in the revisions to the Guangzhou meeting.
>
> Bruce
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoff Thompson [mailto:thompson@ieee.org]
> Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 8:51 PM
> To: Bruce Kraemer
> Cc: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; andrew.myles@cisco.com; j.haasz@ieee.org; Glenn Parsons
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] Results of EC ballot on Liaison letter to SC6
>
> Folks-
>
> I know it is time to ship this thing but (as an engineer and as always) I have a couple of minor twiddles that
> (a) if we put in will improve the accuracy of the text but
> (b) we can live without.
>
> They are:
> #1
> Where we say: "It also avoids any difficulties related to the MAC address registry agreements between IEEE, ISO and IEC, which rely on a number of the documents identified in 6N14713."
>
> It should say: "It also avoids any difficulties related to the registry agreements between IEEE, ISO and IEC, which rely on a number of the documents identified in 6N14713."
>
> RATIONALE: We wish to protect all of the registries (e.g. EtherType) related to 802, not just the MAC address registry.
>
> #2
> Where we say: "We note that the ISO/IEC "stabilized" status is beneficial to stakeholders because the IEEE has no equivalent status that does not require ongoing maintenance."
>
> It should say: "We note that the ISO/IEC "stabilized" status is beneficial to stakeholders because the IEEE has no equivalent status."
>
> RATIONALE: IEEE doesn't have any equivalent status (by either name or
> practice) as of the new year which is "equivalent."
>
> I suggest we leave it up to Paul and Bruce to decide what to do regarding this input.
>
> Happy New Year to all and Best Regards,
>
> Geoff
>
>
> On 61//12 2:22 PM, Bruce Kraemer wrote:
>> Dear EC,
>> On December 27th we closed an EC vote to approve a liaison document to SC6.
>> The results are shown below, and yes, the motion passed - thank you.
>>
>> [cid:image003.jpg@01CCCC97.C54A9870]
>>
>> As a result of the comments there were a couple of word changes. I also reformatted the material as an EC document with Paul as the author.
>> The final version can be found here:
>>
>> https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/12/ec-12-0001-00-00EC-liaison-to-sc
>> 6-re-8802-standards.doc
>>
>> Paul will be sending this to SC6 shortly (our submission deadline is January 10).
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>> ----------
>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>
>>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.