Re: [802SEC] PARs

["James P. K. Gilb" <gilb@ieee.org>]

Roger

OK, can you give me a short note one which new PAR applies to which part 
of the new .16 split?

James Gilb

On 11/02/2011 03:44 PM, Roger Marks wrote:
> Pat,
>
> Yes, this is right. Two existing amendment PARs are being split because the base standard was split. This was noted in the announcement:
> 	<http://ieee802.org/secmail/msg14123.html>
>
> I'll bring your comment to the 802.16 WG for review.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roger
>
>
> Roger B. Marks<roger@consensii.com>
> Consensii LLC<http://consensii.com>
> Chair, IEEE 802.16 Working Group on Broadband Wireless Access<http://WirelessMAN.org>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2011/11/02, at 12:08 PM, Pat Thaler wrote:
>
> > If I recall correctly, those were for work that needed to amend both 802.16.1 and 802.16 so one standards effort needed two amendment PARs. However, I think they should have a small difference in scope that indicates what part of the work is being done in that amendment. E.g. when we needed an amendment to 802.1Q and 802.3 to do PFC, the scope for the 802.3 amendment specified that it was to add the MAC control frame for PFC.
> >
> > Pat
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of James P. K. Gilb
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:05 AM
> > To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> > Subject: Re: [802SEC] PARs
> >
> > All
> >
> > Sorry about that, I finally got around to updating the page.
> >
> > However, I am confused about Roger's PARs, perhaps he can explain them.
> >
> > 802.16.1b and 802.16p seem to cover the same scope.  Likewise,802.16.1a
> > and 802.16n are also the same scope.
> >
> > I assume that what is really happening is that one PAR is replacing the
> > other, but then that doesn't make sense really either.
> >
> > James Gilb
> >
> > On 11/01/2011 07:42 AM, Tony Jeffree wrote:
> > > I notice that the PARs page  shows no PARs under consideration for
> > > November, but I'm sure I have seen one or two whizz by on the exploder.
> > > Does anyone have a definitive list?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tony
> > >
> > > ----------
> > > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.
> >
> > ----------
> > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.
> >
> > ----------
> > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.