Re: [802SEC] [802.1 - 7605] P802.1AEbn
True.
Regards,
Tony
On 17 October 2010 18:23, Mick Seaman <mickseaman@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Ballots due Oct. 25-27: P802.1AC/D1.2, P802.1Q-REV/D1.3
> Due in Nov.: P802.1Qbf/D1.0, P802.1aq/D3.
> For particulars see
> www.ieee802.org/1/email-pages/ballots.html
> This list strips out HTML. For more format and size rules, see "Sending"
> at
> 802.1 list help: www.ieee802.org/1/email-pages/actl1109.html
> -----
>
> Of course you mean P802.1AEbn.
>
> Thanks, Mick
>
>
>
> On 10/17/2010 4:27 AM, Tony Jeffree wrote:
>
>> Ballots due Oct. 25-27: P802.1AC/D1.2, P802.1Q-REV/D1.3
>> Due in Nov.: P802.1Qbf/D1.0, P802.1aq/D3.
>> For particulars see
>> www.ieee802.org/1/email-pages/ballots.html
>> This list strips out HTML. For more format and size rules, see "Sending"
>> at
>> 802.1 list help: www.ieee802.org/1/email-pages/actl1109.html
>> -----
>>
>> OK - so having had 3 offline messages pointing out that "bm" is an acronym
>> used in the US that has potentially unsavoury connotations, we will go
>> for P802.1AXbn,
>> which I believe is safe. Going once...
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> On 16 October 2010 09:32, Tony Jeffree<tony@jeffree.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Geoff -
>>>
>>> You are of course right; slip of the brain there. However, we are also
>>> avoiding "j" in this instance, given that it would be prefixed by "b",
>>> and
>>> will similarly be avoiding "bs", which I guess most of us aspire to do
>>> anyway.
>>>
>>> So, let's make that P802.1AXbm, unless anyone can find any unacceptable
>>> innuendo attached to "bm".
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tony
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 October 2010 03:51, Geoff Thompson<thompson@ieee.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Tony-
>>>>
>>>> The convention in 802.3 is not to use "i", "l" or "o" in project
>>>> designations.
>>>> I thought 802.1 was following the same convention.
>>>>
>>>> Geoff
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 15/10/10 3:28 AM, Tony Jeffree wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Colleauges -
>>>>
>>>> It has been pointed out to me that 802.1 has already used the "bk"
>>>> suffix,
>>>> albeit on a different base standard (P802.1AXbk). As we prefer to keep
>>>> these
>>>> suffixes unique regardless of base standard, we will use the next
>>>> available
>>>> suffix (bl, making this P802.1AEbl) in the final version of this draft
>>>> PAR;
>>>> this will get edited in along with any other changes that are agreed by
>>>> 802.1 in November as a result of any comments made.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tony
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10 October 2010 22:01, Tony Jeffree<tony@jeffree.co.uk> <
>>>> tony@jeffree.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tony
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Tony Jeffree<tony@jeffree.co.uk> <tony@jeffree.co.uk>
>>>> Date: 7 October 2010 22:31
>>>> Subject: Draft PAR/5C for P802.1AEbk
>>>> To: 802-1<STDS-802-1-L@listserv.ieee.org> <
>>>> STDS-802-1-L@listserv.ieee.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Colleauges -
>>>>
>>>> I have posted a draft PAR and 5C here:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2010/new-seaman-AEbk-par-1010.pdf
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2010/new-seaman-AEbk-5c-1010.pdf
>>>>
>>>> It is 802.1's intention to submit these to the closing EC meeting in
>>>> November for approval to forward to NesCom; I am therefore
>>>> precirculating
>>>> the draft text to the EC under the procedure for PARs.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tony
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------
>>>> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>>>> This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ===
>> Unsubscribe link: mailto:STDS-802-1-L-SIGNOFF-REQUEST@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>> IEEE. Fostering technological innovation and excellence for the benefit of
>> humanity.
>>
>>
> ===
> Unsubscribe link: mailto:STDS-802-1-L-SIGNOFF-REQUEST@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> IEEE. Fostering technological innovation and excellence for the benefit of
> humanity.
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.