Re: [802SEC] +++ EC vote on IEEE P802.3az RevCom submittal
Approve.
Regards,
Tony
On 2 September 2010 19:51, Law, David <dlaw@hp.com> wrote:
> Dear EC members,
>
> Further to the email below the IEEE P802.3az Energy-efficient Ethernet 3rd
> sponsor recirculation ballot closed at 11:59PM on 29th August with no new
> negatives. The summary ballot results are as follows:
>
> 127 voters
> 103 affirmative votes
> 1 negative votes with comments
> 0 negative votes without comments
> 6 abstention votes
>
> 86% returned
> 5% abstention
> 99% affirmative
>
> We received only one comment - it was an editorial coordination comment
> that reads 'This draft meets all editorial requirements'.
>
> I have provided the full results in the attached file.
>
> Based on the above, and since I didn't request conditional approval in
> July, Paul has delegated to me the conduct of the EC electronic ballot on
> the motion below.
>
>
> Motion
> ======
>
> The EC approves the IEEE P802.3az submittal remaining on the September 2010
> RevCom agenda.
>
> Move: David Law
> Second: Bruce Kraemer
>
> Start of ballot: Thursday 2nd September
> Close of ballot: Sunday 12th September, 11:59PM AOE
>
> Early close: As required in subclause 4.1.2.2 'Electronic Balloting' of the
> IEEE project 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) Operations Manual, this
> is notice that, to ensure the release is provided in a timely manner, this
> ballot may close early once sufficient responses are received to clearly
> decide a matter.
>
> Best regards,
> David Law
>
>
>
> Paul Nikolich wrote:
> > Dear EC members,
> >
> > Per out process which states a WG Chair may submit a draft to RevCom
> > without EC approval '.. provided that the Sponsor Chair first notifies
> > the Sponsor email reflector that, in the Chair's view based on the
> > complete RevCom package, there is a reasonable expectation that the
> > submittal will be approved by the Sponsor before the RevCom meeting.'.
> >
> > David Law has requested I review the status of the 802.3az project in
> > preparation for RevCom review. I have determined there is a
> > reasonable expectation the attached submittal will be approved by the
> > EC before the next RevCom meeting and, via this email, am notifying the
> EC as such.
> > See the details below.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --Paul
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Law, David" <dlaw@hp.com>
> > To: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:12 PM
> > Subject: RE: IEEE P802.3az submittal to RevCom
> >
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > The 2nd recirculation ballot on IEEE P802.3az/D3.2 closed with the
> > following results:
> >
> > 96 affirmative votes
> > 5 negative votes with comments
> > 0 negative votes without comments
> > 6 abstention votes
> >
> > 84% returned
> > 5% abstention
> > 95% affirmative
> >
> > A total of 5 comments were submitted but three of them were withdrawn
> > prior to the comment resolution meeting. The meeting took place on
> > Thursday 12th August and no changes were made to the IEEE
> > P802.3az/D3.2 draft. The two remaining comments however are unresolved
> > and as they are associated with a negative vote require recirculation.
> >
> > The 3rd recirculation ballot on IEEE P802.3az opened on Friday 13th
> > August and will close on Sunday 29th August. Based on the email
> > exchange below I would like to proceed to submit IEEE P802.3az to
> > RevCom in order to meet the 20th August submittal deadline. Once the
> > recirculation is complete I will perform an EC email ballot to confirm
> > that the submittal package remain on the September RevCom agenda.
> >
> > The process outlined in Clause 14 states I may submit to RevCom
> > without EC approval '.. provided that the Sponsor Chair first notifies
> > the Sponsor email reflector that, in the Chair's view based on the
> > complete RevCom package, there is a reasonable expectation that the
> > submittal will be approved by the Sponsor before the RevCom meeting.'.
> > I have therefore attached the complete RevCom package I propose to
> submit.
> >
> > Since the scope of the current 3rd recirculation is limited to two
> > unresolved comments I hope that you agree with me that when the 3rd
> > recirculation ballot closes and I perform the EC email ballot the
> > submittal will be approved by the EC.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > David
> > ----------
> > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> > This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.