Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[802SEC] +++EC Ballo final count+++IEEE802.20.2 Draft 1.0 forwarding to sponsor ballot - Closed May 9th 2009



Dear EC Members,



Thank you for your response. The ballot passes with a count of 13/0/0 and 3 DNV.



The finalcount is as follows:

Vote categories:         APP    DIS    ABS    DNV

--------------------------------------------------

VC Mat Sherman.         APP

VC Pat Thaler.                                  DNV

ES Buzz Rigsbee.        APP

RS James Gilb.                                  DNV

TR John Hawkins.        APP

01 Tony Jeffree.        APP

03 David Law.                                   DNV

11 Bruce Kraemer.       APP

15 Bob Heile.           APP

16 Roger Marks.         APP

17 John Lemon.          APP

18 Mike Lynch.          APP

19 Steve Shellhammer.   APP

20 Mark Klerer.         APP

21 Vivek Gupta.         APP

22 Carl Stevenson.      APP

ME Geoff Thompson.       non-voting

---------------------------------------------------
TOTALS                                                 13                0               0                           3

Best  regards,

Mark Klerer


-------------------------------------------------

Dear EC members

As a  follow-up to my previous e-mail (attached) concerning the approval to advance 802.20.2 to sponsor ballot, Paul has authorized me to initiate a 10-day ballot for the following motion:

"The EC approves forwarding Draft 1.0 of IEEE802.20.2 to Sponsor Ballot."

Moved: Mark Klerer

Seconded: Steve Shellhammer

Start of ballot: 29 April, 2009

End of ballot: 9 May or 24 hours after the last EC member votes.

By way of background and recapitulation of the previous e-mail, on the  WG Letter Ballot of 802.20.2 there was 1 no voter with 2 editorial comments and 1 technical comment.  The two editorial comments, were accepted in principal (i.e. accommodated) and the technical comment was rejected.  Details can be found in the attached spreadsheet.  None of the resolutions to these comments required any changes to the draft and none were made.  The resolution to the comments that were accommodated, were done to the satisfaction of the commenter who was present during the discussions.  Given that no changes were made to the draft, the comment resolutions were all recirculated in a 15 day WG Letter Ballot for approval and for forwarding the draft to Sponsor Ballot.  The result of the recirculation was 16-1-0. The one remaining no vote was by the original commenter on the basis of  the original technical comment.
Best regards,

Mark Klerer




----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.