Geoff,
Your second point confuses me. In what way is an asymmetrical service
outside the scope of the OSI model or the Rm described in 802-2001?
jl
On 9/29/2008 2:49 PM, Geoff Thompson wrote:
> Vivek-
>
> I am concerned that:
> a) Your 5 Criteria for an amendment to 802.21 does not have the same
> level of commitment to the 802 Compatibility Criteria as was voiced in
> your original 5 Criteria.
>
> b) This is jumping into the area of highly assymetrical service which
> does not follow the 7 Layer Model and the 802 Overview & Architecture
> Model that define the scope of IEEE 802.
>
> I (and I hope the rest of the EC) look forward to reassurance (and
> documentation) by your WG that my concerns are unwarranted.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Geoff
>
>
> At 06:04 AM 9/24/2008 , Gupta, Vivek G wrote:
> All:
>
> 802.21 intends to present the following PAR for approval by the EC at
> the Nov meeting for forwarding to NESCOM:
>
> P802.21b: Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks:
> Media Independent Handover Services - Extensions for Supporting
> Downlink Only Broadcast Technologies
>
> The PAR is available at the following URL:
>
http://mentor.ieee.org/802.21/file/08/21-08-0260-04-bcst-broadcast-handovers
> -sg-par-5c.doc
>
> A tutorial on this topic was presented in the July meeting and can be
> found at:
>
http://www.ieee802.org/21/Tutorials/21-08-0199-03-0000-broadcast-handovers-t
> utorial.pdf
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> -Vivek
>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv.
>