Re: [802SEC] +++10 Day Ballot+++Opens 07 March Closes 17 March
Arnie-
This has all become complicated and I have trouble keeping track where we
are with respect to my suggestions and your incorporation of them into your
text. Having said that, I have one major problem with your procedure. I am
saying this as a strong suggestion from a member of the EC, not a dictate
from the OC.
If I understand what you are trying to do, then I think your "OPEN roll
call survey" is a bad idea.
If the purpose is for individuals to get to express their preference in
order to sway entity voters to the individual view then this method has a
problem. In an "open" survey, participants will be inhibited by their
employer/sponsor's position.
The "roll call survey" should be taken by secret paper ballot (as I believe
I said in an earlier message) and then the results should be announced.
That the survey will be taken via secret paper ballots should be clear and
unambiguous in the procedures. The use of the term "open roll call survey"
does not support the above.
Sincerely,
Geoff
At 06:58 AM 3/12/2008 , greenspana@BELLSOUTH.NET wrote:
>John:
>
>Pat and Geoffs comments have been addressed. I am attaching the revised
>motion. Item 4 of the motion refers to the staw poll as a suvey not a
>vote, it also states that the survey will be done openly. However those
>comments were addressed to the motion on a voting proceedure which opened
>on 06 March and closed on 16 March. You have already voted Approve in
>respect to that proceedure. This motion is in regard to the handeling of
>requests for a change in affiliation in the middle of a sponsor ballot.
>There were comments by Bob and Mike Takefman on this proceedure. All of
>theur comments have been incorporated. I am attaching the revised
>proceedures for voting and the handeling of affiliation change to this E-mail.
>
>Arnie
>
>Arnie
>-------------- Original message from J Lemon <jlemon@IEEE.ORG>:
>--------------
>
>
> > I'm uncomfortable voting until Pat's and Geoff's comments have been
> > addressed.
> >
> > On 3/11/2008 10:56 AM, greenspana@BELLSOUTH.NET wrote:
> > > All:
> > >
> > > The voting status of those eligible to vote on the motion below is as
> follows:
> > >
> > > CH: Paul Nikolich - Did Not Vote
> > > ES: Buzz Rigsbee - Approve
> > > RS: Bob O'Hara - Did Not Vote
> > > TR: John Hawkins - Did Not Vote
> > > 01: Tony Jeffree - Did Not Vote
> > > 15: Bob Heile - Did Not Vote
> > > 17: John Lemon - Did Not Vote
> > > 18: Mike Lynch - Did Not Vote
> > > 20: Arnie Greenspan - Approve
> > > The latest proceedure is attached for your review. If you have not
> yet voted
> > and are eligible to do so, please vote.
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Arnie
> > >
> > > Dear EC Members,
> > >
> > > The 802 Chair, Paul Nikolich, has delegated the conduct of the following
> > motion via 802 EC email ballot to me, Arnie Greenspan.
> > >
> > > Moved: The Unconflicted 802 EC members approve the attached
> > > Procedure, to be used in the event there is a request for a change to an
> > individuals block assignment during the 802.20 Sponsor ballot.
> > > Opens: 07 MAR 2008; Closes 17 MAR2008
> > >
> > > Mover: Arnie Greenspan
> > > Seconder: Buzz Rigsbee
> > >
> > > Unconflicted EC (UC EC) members regarding 802.20 WG matters are
> eligible to
> > cast a ballot on this issue.
> > >
> > > UC EC Voters:
> > > ----------------
> > > CH Paul Nikolich
> > > ES Buzz Rigsbee
> > > RS Bob O'Hara
> > > TR John Hawkins
> > > 01 Tony Jeffree
> > > 15 Bob Heile
> > > 17 John Lemon
> > > 18 Mike Lynch
> > > 20 Arnie Greenspan
> > > ME Geoff Thompson non-voting
> > >
> > > EC members not eligible to vote:
> > > --------------------------------
> > > V1 Mat Sherman
> > > V2 Pat Thaler
> > > 03 Bob Grow
> > > 11 Stuart Kerry
> > > 16 Roger Marks
> > > 19 Steve Shellhammer
> > > 21 Vivek Gupta
> > > 22 Carl Stevenson
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------
> > > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This
> > list is maintained by Listserv.
> > >
> >
> > ----------
> > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list
> > is maintained by Listserv.
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
>list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.