Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] notice regarding the 802.20 Sponsor Ballot



Tony,

You are correct, a response is requested by those not on the inital list of 
affiliates.  Regardless, that is a lot of people (and potential phone 
calls), pending the response we receive.

Regards,

--Paul

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tony Jeffree" <tony@jeffree.co.uk>
To: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
Cc: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [802SEC] notice regarding the 802.20 Sponsor Ballot


> Paul -
>
> I'm happy with the logic, but the email could have been better worded in 
> that case - it suggests that a response is needed only if your affiliation 
> isn't on the list. So the responders will be the exceptions only, not the 
> whole of the balloting group. Looks like someone will be doing a LOT of 
> phone calling...
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
> At 18:48 11/12/2007, Paul Nikolich wrote:
>>Carl, Tony,
>>
>>The schedule is aggressive and we are shooting for a 100% response rate.
>>This will require each person that doesn't respond via email to be 
>>contacted
>>via alternate means, probably starting tomorrow..
>>
>>--Paul
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Carl R. Stevenson" <wk3c@wk3c.com>
>>To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
>>Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:58 PM
>>Subject: Re: [802SEC] notice regarding the 802.20 Sponsor Ballot
>>
>>
>>>I agree ...
>>>
>>>Carl
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>>>>[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of
>>>>Tony Jeffree
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 11:09 AM
>>>>To: Paul Nikolich
>>>>Cc: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>>>>Subject: Re: [802SEC] notice regarding the 802.20 Sponsor Ballot
>>>>
>>>>Paul -
>>>>
>>>>Three days seems to me a little short for a matter of this
>>>>importance to be properly concluded. It is not uncommon for
>>>>people to be out of email contact for longer periods than that.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Tony
>>>>
>>>>At 13:37 11/12/2007, Paul Nikolich wrote:
>>>> >This is a re-send, the first attempt did not make it through the
>>>> >mail system for some reason.   Bob Grow and Steve Mills--please make
>>>> >sure this is distributed to the Standards Board and BoG
>>>>members as well.
>>>> >
>>>> >Regards,
>>>> >--Paul
>>>> >   ----- Original Message -----
>>>> >   From: Paul Nikolich
>>>> >   To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>>>> >   Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 7:20 PM
>>>> >   Subject: notice regarding the 802.20 Sponsor Ballot
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >   Dear EC members,
>>>> >
>>>> >   Attached below is a notice sent to the 802.20 Sponsor
>>>>Ballot group
>>>> > members earlier today clarifying the process that will be used in
>>>> > carrying out the sponsor ballot.  Since the process is outside the
>>>> > normal process, I thought you should all be informed in the
>>>>event you
>>>> > are asked questions about it.
>>>> >
>>>> >   Regards,
>>>> >
>>>> >   --Paul
>>>> >
>>>> >   ----- Original Message -----
>>>> >   From: M.Kipness@ieee.org
>>>> >   To: M.Kipness@ieee.org
>>>> >   Cc: paul.nikolich@att.net
>>>> >   Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 5:58 PM
>>>> >   Subject: Message re: 802.20 Sponsor Ballot
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >   Dear Sponsor Ballot Group Member,
>>>> >
>>>> >   As of 9DEC2007 the attached document contains the current list of
>>>> > entities into which ballot group members are known to be
>>>>affiliated with.
>>>> >
>>>> >   Per the 5DEC07 SASB resolution, the ballot group members
>>>>affliated
>>>> > with a particular entity will be aggregated into a bloc.  Each bloc
>>>> > will have one Approve/Disapprove/Abstain vote allocated to
>>>>it in the
>>>> > 802.20 WG  Sponsor Ballot ("the bloc-list").
>>>> > A more precise definition of the Sponsor Ballot process is attached
>>>> > along with the 05DEC07 SASB resolution.
>>>> >
>>>> >   The bloc-list is not complete yet--you may need to
>>>>respond to this
>>>> > email to have your entity added to the bloc-list.
>>>> >
>>>> >   If the entity you are affiliated with is included in the
>>>>bloc-list,
>>>> > and you declared the your affiliation properly during the Sponsor
>>>> > Ballot sign-up, no further action is needed on your part.
>>>> >
>>>> >   If your affiliation is not included in the bloc-list,
>>>>please send an
>>>> > email to the 802.20 WG Chair greenspan  to request your
>>>>affiliation be
>>>> > added to the bloc-list. You have until  Thursday 13
>>>> > DEC2007 AOE to respond to this email.
>>>> >
>>>> >   As a reminder, the definition of affiliation is at
>>>> > http://standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliationFAQ.html
>>>> >
>>>> >   Regards
>>>> >
>>>> >   --Paul Nikolich-
>>>> >   LMSC Sponsor Chair
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >   Sincerely,
>>>> >
>>>> >   Michael D. Kipness
>>>> >   Program Manager
>>>> >   Technical Program Development
>>>> >   IEEE Standards Activities
>>>> >   +1 732-562-3810 Voice
>>>> >   +1 732-562-1571  Fax
>>>> >   m.kipness@ieee.org
>>>> >
>>>> >----------
>>>> >This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
>>>>reflector.
>>>> >This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>>
>>>>----------
>>>>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
>>>>reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>>
>>>----------
>>>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. 
>>>This
>>>list is maintained by Listserv.
>>
>>----------
>>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This 
>>list is maintained by Listserv.
>>
>>
>
>
> 

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.