Re: [802SEC] straw poll--is it time to abolish the non-conflicted EC?
I hadn't considered the possibility. I thought we were stuck with this
at least until 802.20's sponsor ballot. But if you think we are or might
be allowed to abolish it, and if it removes an evening meeting from my
schedule, I'm all for it. ;-)
Seriously, I never saw the need for it, as I don't believe that there
has ever been any sign or allegation of collusion or other practices
that might require preventing members with certain affiliations from
voting on 802.20 issues. Unless someone can point out any past
unprofessional behavior of EC members, or has a really good story for
how they can predict future behaviors, I think it should be terminated.
jl
On 11/7/2007 2:08 PM, Paul Nikolich wrote:
> All,
>
> I want to get a sense of the EC regarding the non-conflicted EC partitioning on 802.20 WG matters. Do you think it is reasonable for us to consider abolishing the non-conflicted EC, now that the 802.20 WG has moved to entity voting and seems to be operating in a fair, open and unbiased manner (at least that is my opinion)?
>
> I am not sure if we have the authority to abolish the non-conflicted EC, that may rest with SASB. But we can petition SASB to abolish it, if that is the consensus of the EC. Something to think about....
>
> Please weigh in on this via the reflector. We can discuss it a bit at the opening EC meeting during the non-conflicted EC status request agenda item, but we don't have time to get in to a long discussion.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.