Re: [802SEC] Reminder-- I need EC members to respond regarding their classification as a "conflicted" or "non-conflicted" EC member
No change.
-Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 7:25 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [802SEC] Reminder-- I need EC members to respond regarding
their classification as a "conflicted" or "non-conflicted" EC member
Dear EC members,
I received responses to the below request from Mat Sherman, Pat Thaler,
John
Hawkins, Geoff Thompson, John Lemon, Mike Lynch and Arnie Greenspan. 7
out
of 17. I need a response from everyone immediately.
Please send me an email today (7MAY2007) either way--change or no
change.
Furthermore, if you feel that circumstances (i.e., of new events that
create
or dispel a conflict) have changed regarding your classification as a
"non-conflicted" or "conflicted" EC member regarding 802.20
matters--please
explain.
Regards,
--Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 1:07 PM
Subject: [802SEC] re-confirmation of the "non-conflicted" EC membership
> Dear EC members,
>
> If any of you feel that circumstances (i.e., of new events that create
or
> dispel a conflict) have changed regarding your classification as a
> "non-conflicted" or "conflicted" EC member regarding 802.20 matters, I
> need
> to know soon. Please respond directly to me, either way, no-change or
> change (with a short explanation), no later than midnight Friday 4 May
> 2007.
>
> As you may recall, we went through this process in October (see the
> attached
> document) and will need to periodically review our members status. In
the
> future, I will ask EC members if there has been a change in their
> circumstances in the opening EC meeting of plenary sessions until the
> non-conflicted is no longer required. Also, if there is a change in
your
> circumstances asynchronous to the once-per-plenary poll, please notify
me
> upon that change.
>
> At a minimum, the non-conflicted EC must decide where to classify John
> Lemon, the new 802.17 Chair. I'm not sure if this can be done via
email
> or
> a telecon is required--I'll let you know.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
> To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:36 PM
> Subject: [802SEC] non-conflicted EC member regarding 802.20 WG matters
> announcement
>
>
> Dear EC members and 802.20 WG members,
>
> In order to meet the directive announced by the IEEE SA Standards
Board on
> 19SEP2006
> (http://standards.ieee.org/announcements/IEEESASB802.20Report.pdf)
> 11 IEEE 802 LMSC Executive Committee members were determined to be
> non-conflicted with respect to 802.20 WG matters as per the attached
> document.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul Nikolich
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.