Re: [802SEC] +++ECmail ballot(closes no later than 27April2007 +++Motion to Affirm
Pat:
I'm in substantial agreement with you here.
Because of my great respect for Paul as Chair, I choose to make my
discomfort with Paul's guidance on this vote only govern my personal
actions. I do not believe I should vote on any 802.20 item until the EC
receives direction that changes the last instructions we received from
the IEEE-SA Standards Board.
As I suggested in a previous message that the March SASB meeting serve
as precedent. I now cite that as personal reinforcement that I should
be recused on this issue. (At the March Standards Board meeting, as a
conflicted SASB member I was instructed not to vote on the SASB
confirmation of the 802.20 Vice Chairs.) I expect that being recused
for conflict of interest, I should also not be counted in the
denominator for computing approval. (The unapproved March Standards
Board minutes record the vote without including the conflicted SASB
members in the denominator.)
BTW, the new SASB members were also vetted for conflict of interest on
this issue, and all continuing SASB members were asked if anything had
changed in their status that could change conflict of interest on 802.20
items.
--Bob Grow
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Pat Thaler
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 3:28 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ECmail ballot(closes no later than 27April2007
+++Motion to Affirm
I haven't voted yet because the rules that apply to the result of a vote
should be announced before the vote starts. I don't expect it will make
a difference this time but I also see no reason to create the precedent
by collecting votes before Paul announces his decision on who can vote.
I had hoped that he would do so before the ballot period closes.
It is a bad example to set to conduct a ballot and decide the rules
after the fact. When chairs do that on a vote that is controversial it
tends to produce accusations of bias. The best practice to avoid that is
to make a habit of having the rules in place first.
Regards,
Pat Thaler
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Carl R. Stevenson
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 3:13 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ECmail ballot(closes no later than 27April2007
+++Motion to Affirm
Arnie,
I said I'd vote "approve" if I'm allowed to vote on this one.
Regards,
Carl
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org]
On Behalf Of greenspana@bellsouth.net
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 10:47 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org; greenspana@bellsouth.net
Subject: [802SEC] +++ECmail ballot(closes no later than 27April2007
+++Motion to Affirm
All:
The staus of the motion to confirm the appointment of Mr. Mark Klerer as
Proceeedural Vice-Chair and Mr. Jim Mollenauer as Liaison Vice-Chair of
802.20 has the following result to date.
VC- Mat Sherman APP
VC-Pat Thaler DNV
ES-Buzz Rigsbee DNV
RS-Bob O'Hara APP
TR-John Hawkins APP
01-Tony Jeffree APP
03-Bob Grow DNV
11-Stuart Kerry DNV
15-Bob Heile APP
16-Roger Marks DNV
18-Mike Lynch APP
19-Steve Shellhammer APP
20-Arnie Greenspan APP
21-Vivek Gupta APP
22-Carl Stevenson DNV
ME-Geoff Thompson Non-Voting
Summary:
16 voting 10 Approve 6DNV
Those who wish to vote have until 27 April
Arnie greenspan
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.