Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Draft 802.16m PAR for 802 EC consideration in November



Roger,

	I reviewed the 16m PAR and 5C and I have several suggested
edits.  I want to ensure that this project does not prevent any other
working groups from developing solutions for IMT-Advanced, so there are
a few edits related to that.  I also modified the text regarding the
coexistence assurance document in the 5C.  I spoke to several people
regarding IMT-Advanced and at this point the requirements are not clear
enough to say that IMT-Advanced will only operate in licensed bands.
The wording is such that a CA document is only required if unlicensed
bands are used.  Finally, there are a few general edits.

	The suggested edits are in an attached work document.  I made
the changes with "track changes" enabled so to make the suggested
changes easy to identify.

	See you in Dallas.

Regards,
Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 6:09 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [802SEC] Draft 802.16m PAR for 802 EC consideration in November

Dear 802 EC Colleagues:

I am writing to notify you of a new PAR proposal that arose out of  
the 802.16 WG's September interim session:

* P802.16m: <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/80216-06_054.pdf>
* Five C:   <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/80216-06_055.pdf>

To help explain the proposal, we are arranging an accompanying  
tutorial on Monday evening:
* Tutorial: <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/80216-06_056.pdf>


Regards,

Roger

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.

Suggested wording changes to 802.16m PAR and 5C.doc