Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email ballot closed 17SEP2006+++ Motion to approve the attached EC response to inquiry regarding the SC6 review of 8802-1
I'm about to board a plane for the .3 meeting in Tennessee which will put us nearly maximally out of sync in time zones. I probably won't have a chance to respond until Monday.
Pat
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Myles (amyles) [mailto:amyles@CISCO.COM]
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 03:20 PM Pacific Standard Time
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email ballot closed 17SEP2006+++ Motion to approve the attached EC response to inquiry regarding the SC6 review of 8802-1
G'day Paul
I am at the IEEE 802.11 meeting in Melbourne this week. I will spend
today processing and responding to the comments from Tony, Carl, Geoff
and Pat. I will attempt to modify the ppt to satisfy as many concerns as
possible, without detracting from its essence. To allow us to have
another ballot later this week could everyone please respond to my
e-mails today as soon as possible.
Thanks
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org]
On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
Sent: Monday, 18 September 2006 3:16 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [802SEC] +++EC Email ballot closed 17SEP2006+++ Motion to
approve the attached EC response to inquiry regarding the SC6 review of
8802-1
Dear EC Members,
The below ballot has until the end of the day today (17SEP2006) It
currently has very poor of response (of 16 EC members, only Tony and
Carl cast negative ballots and Geoff provided comments.)
Given the lack of response, it is unlikely this ballot will pass.
Andrew, please attempt to address the negative comments and begin
preparing a new motion for consideration immediately.
Regards,
--Paul
> > >
> > > Per the below email I sent you last Friday
> > > (http://www.ieee802.org/secmail/msg08457.html) , a revised version
> > > of the IEEE 802 position statement on the review of the 8802-1 and
> > > related documents by SC6 is attached for EC approval.
> > >
> > > Motion: The 802 LMSC EC resolves to adopt the attached position
> > > statement (appropriately edited to remove the "DRAFT" and "Change
> > > History" text) Moved-Tony Jeffree Seconded-Mat Sherman
> > >
> > > Please cast your vote as soon as possible. The ballot closes the
> > > earlier of either 17 Sept 2006 or 24 hours after every EC member
> > > has
>
> > > cast a vote.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --Paul Nikolich
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> > > Subject: [802SEC] request for input from 802 EC members regarding
> > > 8802-1 review
> > > From: Paul Nikolich <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
> > > Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:40:57 -0400
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ------------------
> > >
> > > Dear EC Members,
> > >
> > > In an e-mail sent to this reflector two weeks ago a process was
> > > outlined to develop an IEEE 802 LMSC position on potential
> > > revisions
>
> > > to ISO/IEC TR 8802-1:2001, which documents a cooperation process
> > > between IEEE 802 LMSC and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6/WG1.
> > >
> > > Since that time a small group has contributed to a draft position
> > > IEEE 802 LMSC statement for submission to Robin Tasker (editor of
> > > 8802-1) by 27 Sept 06. Andrew Myles coordinated the activity and
> > > developed the draft position statement in the attached powerpoint
> > > document. Contributions were received from Geoff Thompson, Steve
> > > Mills, Pat Thaler, David Law, Andrew Myles, Gary Robinson, Bob
> > > Pritchard and Paul Nikolich. The draft position does not
> > > necessarily
>
> > > represent the views of all contributors.
> > >
> > > The original plan was to have a teleconference next week to
> > > discuss the position statement. However, the lack of response from
> > > the EC (and, presumably, their WG/TAG membership) suggests this is
> > > probably
>
> > > not a useful exercise. The lack of response is not surprising
> > > because, although the the relationship with ISO/IEC is important,
> > > it
>
> > > is "esoteric standards work", orthogonal to the interests of most
> > > Working Group members.
> > >
> > > A slightly modified process to approve this document will now be
> > > followed:
> > >
> > > a.. The draft position statement is attached to this e-mail for
> > > comments by the 802 EC. Comments should be sent to the
> > > 802 EC reflector and cc'ed to Andrew Myles
(andrew.myles@cisco.com).
>
> > > The closing date for comments is 5pm ET on Thursday, 7 Sept 06.
> > > b.. Andrew Myles will generate an updated version of the draft
> > > position statement based on these comments by 7am ET on Friday, 8
> > > Sept 06.
> > > c.. The 8 Sept 06 version will be sent out for EC approval via
> > > an
> > > 802 EC e-mail ballot on 8 Sept 06. The ballot will close on 17
> > > Sept 06.
> > > d.. If the EC ballot fails, Andrew Myles will make further
> > > changes
>
> > > early in the week during the IEEE 802.11 WG interim session in
> > > Melbourne and a second 802 EC e-mail ballot will be issued with a
> > > closing date of 26 Sept 06.
> > > e.. I want to avoid a second EC e-mail ballot--hence the
> > > 1-7 Sept comment period--please, please, please provide your input
> > > prior to 5 pm ET 7 Sept 06.
> > > f.. Assuming a position statement is approved, it will be sent
> > > to Robin Tasker on 26 Sept 06.
> > > Andrew Myles is available to discuss the draft position statement
> > > at
>
> > > any time after 5am (3pm ET) any day next week on
> > > +61 2 84461010 (W) or +61 418
> > > 656587 (M).
> > >
> > > ----------
> > > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
reflector.
>
> > > This list is maintained by Listserv.
> > >
> >
> >----------
> >This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> >This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.