Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email ballot (closes no later than 17SEP2006)+++ Motion to approve the attached EC position statement regarding the SC6 review of 8802-1
Approve.
Regards,
Tony
At 21:08 08/09/2006, Paul Nikolich wrote:
>Dear EC Members,
>
>Per the below email I sent you last Friday
>(http://www.ieee802.org/secmail/msg08457.html) , a revised version of the
>IEEE 802 position statement on the review of the 8802-1 and related
>documents by SC6 is attached for EC approval.
>
>Motion: The 802 LMSC EC resolves to adopt the attached position statement
>(appropriately edited to remove the "DRAFT" and "Change History" text)
>Moved-Tony Jeffree
>Seconded-Mat Sherman
>
>Please cast your vote as soon as possible. The ballot closes the earlier
>of either 17 Sept 2006 or 24 hours after every EC member has cast a vote.
>
>Regards,
>
>--Paul Nikolich
>
>
>
>To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
>Subject: [802SEC] request for input from 802 EC members regarding 8802-1
>review
>From: Paul Nikolich <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
>Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:40:57 -0400
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Dear EC Members,
>
>In an e-mail sent to this reflector two weeks ago a process was outlined
>to develop an IEEE 802 LMSC position on potential revisions to ISO/IEC TR
>8802-1:2001, which documents a cooperation process between IEEE 802 LMSC
>and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6/WG1.
>
>Since that time a small group has contributed to a draft position IEEE 802
>LMSC statement for submission to Robin Tasker (editor of 8802-1) by 27
>Sept 06. Andrew Myles coordinated the activity and developed the draft
>position statement in the attached powerpoint document. Contributions were
>received from Geoff Thompson, Steve Mills, Pat Thaler, David Law, Andrew
>Myles, Gary Robinson, Bob Pritchard and Paul Nikolich. The draft position
>does not necessarily represent the views of all contributors.
>
>The original plan was to have a teleconference next week to discuss the
>position statement. However, the lack of response from the EC (and,
>presumably, their WG/TAG membership) suggests this is probably not a
>useful exercise. The lack of response is not surprising because, although
>the the relationship with ISO/IEC is important, it is "esoteric standards
>work", orthogonal to the interests of most Working Group members.
>
>A slightly modified process to approve this document will now be followed:
>
> a.. The draft position statement is attached to this e-mail for comments
> by the 802 EC. Comments should be sent to the 802 EC reflector and cc'ed
> to Andrew Myles (andrew.myles@cisco.com). The closing date for comments
> is 5pm ET on Thursday, 7 Sept 06.
> b.. Andrew Myles will generate an updated version of the draft position
> statement based on these comments by 7am ET on Friday, 8 Sept 06.
> c.. The 8 Sept 06 version will be sent out for EC approval via an 802 EC
> e-mail ballot on 8 Sept 06. The ballot will close on 17 Sept 06.
> d.. If the EC ballot fails, Andrew Myles will make further changes early
> in the week during the IEEE 802.11 WG interim session in Melbourne and a
> second 802 EC e-mail ballot will be issued with a closing date of 26 Sept 06.
> e.. I want to avoid a second EC e-mail ballot--hence the 1-7 Sept
> comment period--please, please, please provide your input prior to 5 pm
> ET 7 Sept 06.
> f.. Assuming a position statement is approved, it will be sent to Robin
> Tasker on 26 Sept 06.
>Andrew Myles is available to discuss the draft position statement at any
>time after 5am (3pm ET) any day next week on +61 2 84461010 (W) or +61 418
>656587 (M).
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
>list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.