Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] ***SEC Five Day Review*** Response to New Zealand Consultation "Spectrum Allocations for BWA - A Discussion Paper"



Thanks Paul, I'll make the changes.

From Mexico City,

Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 17:56
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] ***SEC Five Day Review*** Response to New Zealand
Consultation "Spectrum Allocations for BWA - A Discussion Paper"


Michael,

In footnote 2:
[2] This document represents the views of IEEE 802.18.  It does not 
necessarily represent the views of the IEEE as a whole or the IEEE
Standards 
Association as a whole.

I suggest the following change:
[2] This document represents the views of IEEE 802.18.  It does not 
represent the views of the IEEE as a whole or the IEEE Standards
Association 
as a whole.

By removing 'necessarily' the communication is more accurate.

I would also recommend adding the names of the TGs 802.11y and 802.16h
for 
those that may not be familiar with those projects.

Regards,

--Paul



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Lynch" <mjlynch@NORTEL.COM>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 5:50 PM
Subject: [802SEC] ***SEC Five Day Review*** Response to New Zealand 
Consultation "Spectrum Allocations for BWA - A Discussion Paper"


Dear SEC Members,

Attached is a document that the RR-TAG proposes to file with the New
Zealand regulator - the Ministry of Economic Development. This is in
response to their consultation titled "Spectrum Allocations for
Broadband Wireless Access - A Discussion Paper". The full New Zealand
consultation is available on the RR-TAG web site in the July meeting
documents. The title of the consultation document is
"bwa-discussion.pdf". The Ministry is proposing the reuse of the 2.3 GHz
frequency band for BWA. There will be frequency blocks for both licensed
and "licensed light" use.

During the San Diego meeting a representative of the New Zealand
regulator participated in the RR-TAG discussions. This document
provides, for the formal record, the substance of those discussions. New
Zealand, like the U.K., has become a reasonably frequent participant in
the RR-TAG.

The RR-TAG web site can be accessed here:
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/18/

The RR-TAG approved this response during the San Diego meeting but
editing was not completed in time to submit to the EC closing plenary.

The response needs to be filed by COB 4 August New Zealand time.

I propose that the EC review closes on 2 August and that the response be
filed with the Ministry on 3 August.

Regards,

Mike

+1 972 684 7518 (ESN 444 7518) Voice
+1 972 684 3774 (ESN 444 3775) FAX
+1 972 814 4901 (ESN 450 9401) Mobile

 <<18-06-0052-00-0000_NZ_BWA_Discussion_Final.doc>>


----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This 
list is maintained by Listserv. 

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.