Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] +++Motion for P802.3-2005/Cor1 Conditional Approval



approve

-------------------------------------------

Michael Takefman              tak@cisco.com
Distinguished Engineer,       Cisco Systems
Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
3000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
voice: 613-254-3399       cell:613-220-6991 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** 
> [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 3:29 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++Motion for P802.3-2005/Cor1 
> Conditional Approval
> 
> All,
> 
> I designated Bob Grow to conduct the ballot at the March 2006 
> plenary session.  I apologize for not making that clear at the time.
> 
> Bob Grow has made the motion, received a second (Roger Marks) 
> and I consider the ballot to have started when the second was 
> publically announced (4:35pm et 19APR).  The duration is 5 
> days, the ballot closes 4:35pm et 24APR2006.
> 
> I expect Bob Grow to tally and announce the interim and final 
> results as he sees fit.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --Paul Nikolich
> 802 Chairman
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@ieee.org>
> To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 12:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++Motion for P802.3-2005/Cor1 
> Conditional Approval
> 
> 
> > John,
> >
> > Perhaps I am mistaken, but it's my impression that there is 
> no ballot 
> > underway yet.
> >
> > As I understand the procedure, "The LMSC Chair, or an EC 
> member designated 
> > by the Chair (usually a Vice Chair), shall determine the 
> duration of the 
> > ballot, issue the ballot by e-mail and tally the votes 
> after the ballot is 
> > closed."
> >
> > Under normal circumstances, once a motion is made and 
> seconded, we get a 
> > ballot announcement, such as 
> <http://ieee802.org/secmail/msg07768.html>, 
> > from the Chair (or from someone else, with a designation 
> from the Chair). 
> > The bare minimum needed in such an announcement is a 
> notification that the 
> > ballot is underway, a statement of the motion, and a deadline.
> >
> > I'm awaiting such an announcement before I cast a vote.
> >
> > Roger
> >
> >
> > At 12:08 PM -0400 06/04/20, John Hawkins wrote:
> >>I approve
> >>j
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
> >>[mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Grow, Bob
> >>Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 3:35 PM
> >>To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> >>Subject: [802SEC] +++Motion for P802.3-2005/Cor1 
> Conditional Approval
> >>
> >>Colleagues:
> >>
> >>Per agreement at the closing EC meeting in March, the 
> following motion
> >>for five-day ballot has been moved and seconded.
> >>Grant conditional approval for submittal of 
> P802.3-2005/Cor1 to RevCom
> >>per Clause 20 of the LMSC P&P.
> >>Moved:  Bob Grow
> >>Seconded:  Roger Marks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>BACKGROUND
> >>
> >>If the one negative balloter converts their vote to Approve with
> >>comment, no recirculation ballot need be conducted as no substantive
> >>changes have been made to the draft.  If the negative 
> balloter desires
> >>their comment and rebuttal to be reviewed by the ballot group a
> >>recirculation will be conducted on that one comment.  I 
> will report per
> >>the conditions in Clause 20 in either case.
> >>
> >>Ballot Open Date: 03/10/2006
> >>Ballot Close Date: 04/10/2006
> >>
> >>Response Rate
> >>This ballot has met the 75% returned ballot requirement. 
> 103 eligible 
> >>people in this ballot group. 79 affirmative votes
> >>1 negative votes with comments
> >>0 negative votes without comments
> >>2 abstention votes
> >>82 votes received =   80 % returned
> >>2 % abstention
> >>
> >>Approval Rate
> >>The 75% affirmation requirement is being met. 79 affirmative votes
> >>1 negative votes with comments
> >>80 votes = 99% affirmative
> >>
> >>Comments
> >>5 comments received
> >>One omega symbol in the draft is displayed as an alpha 
> character because
> >>of incorrect font.  The identical text occurs three times 
> in the draft,
> >>twice with the omega symbol (for ohms) and once with an 
> alpha character.
> >>
> >>The editor will add spaces to change a few unit occurrences 
> from "Vdc"
> >>to "V dc" per IEEE style
> >>Some front matter (not part of the approved draft/standard) changes
> >>recommended by the WG Chair were forwarded to the 
> publication editor for
> >>consideration during publication preparation.
> >>At present, there remains one negative comment that was 
> rejected by the
> >>ballot resolution group with rebuttal The D2.0 comment file with
> >>responses is posted at:
> >>http://www.ieee802.org/3/au/comments/D2.0/802.3au_D2p0.pdf.
> >>
> >>----------
> >>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> >>This list is maintained by Listserv.
> >>
> >>----------
> >>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email 
> reflector. This 
> >>list is maintained by Listserv.
> >
> > ----------
> > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email 
> reflector.  This 
> > list is maintained by Listserv. 
> 
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email 
> reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.
> 

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.