Re: [802SEC] +++ motion to upgrade the network+++
I also approve
At 08:20 PM 2/24/2006 -0500, Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:
>At this point we now have three seconds. Don't care who we chose, but I
>officially approve the motion.
>
>Mat
>
>Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
>Senior Member Technical Staff
>BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
>Office: +1 973.633.6344
>email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
>Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 7:33 PM
>To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
>Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ motion to upgrade the network+++
>
>I will second the motion concerning upgrading network equipment
>
>Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
>Senior Member Technical Staff
>BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
>Office: +1 973.633.6344
>email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Nikolich [mailto:paul.nikolich@ATT.NET]
>Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 7:13 PM
>To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
>Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++URGEN*T EC Email Ballot approve expenditure of
>$68.7k to upgrade the network+++
>
>John,
>
>I apologize for starting the ballot without explicit confirmation of
>your
>second. My mistake.
>
>I am cancelling the email ballot and will start it only upon receiving
>an
>indication from an EC member they are willing to second the motion.
>
>Regards,
>
>--Paul
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "John Hawkins" <jhawkins@NORTEL.COM>
>To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
>Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 6:59 PM
>Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++URGEN*T EC Email Ballot approve expenditure of
>$68.7k to upgrade the network+++
>
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > I have indeed reviewed the proposal submitted by Buzz. I understood
>its
> > content and context. I did not, however, agree to second the motion,
>and
> > doing so puts me in an awkward position with the folks who generously
> > send me a paycheck on alternating Fridays.
> >
> > Therefore, I must ask that my name be removed from the motion as
> > seconder, and I wish to recuse myself from this matter. This should
>not
> > be construed as opposition, but I feel I must recuse myself based on
>the
> > implicit vendor selection in the motion.
> >
> > As your Treasurer I can say a few things that might help in your
> > deliberation:
> >
> > 1. Thanks in large part to the increased fees for our plenary
>sessions,
> > IEEE 802 does have the funds for this expenditure.
> > 2. Based on what I've been informed by Buzz and VeriLan, I believe due
> > diligence was carried out to secure reasonable terms for this
>proposal.
> > I am told alternatives were considered. The assessment of required
> > functionality, and evaluation of risks for various alternatives, was
> > conducted by VeriLan and their recommendation is captured in the
>motion
> > before you today.
> > 3. It was my belief that sales taxes would not be a issue since we
>were
> > using VeriLan as our agent for this transaction and that they are
>based
> > in a state that does not collect such taxes.
> >
> > I apologize to the Chair, to Buzz and to the group if my initial
> > indication that I understood the proposal implied I was willing to
> > second it.
> >
> > john
> >
> >
> > -- snip snip
> >
> > ----------
> > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>This
> > list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
>list is maintained by Listserv.
Bob Heile, Ph.D
Chairman, ZigBee Alliance
Chair, IEEE 802.15 Working Group on Wireless Personal Area Networks
11 Louis Road
Attleboro, MA 02703 USA
Mobile: +1-781-929-4832
email: bheile@ieee.org
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.