Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Plenary
Roger's idea looks significantly better than the alternatives to me.
Regards,
Tony
At 19:36 02/02/2006, Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:
>Folks,
>
>I too am inclined to support Roger suggestion.
>
>When the voting is over, I plan to do comment resolution. But before I
>do, I'd like to hear from everyone whether:
>
> 1) my original concept had a prayer (ie don't even bother
>patching it)
> 2) Roger's idea is the best way forward
> 3) We shouldn't be playing with this....
>
>I am particularly interested in the opinion of the larger groups since I
>feel they are the most impacted. One difference between Roger's idea
>and my original idea is that Roger's doesn't help role people off
>quicker from the membership, where as mine would.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mat
>
>Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
>Senior Member Technical Staff
>BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
>Office: +1 973.633.6344
>email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carl R. Stevenson [mailto:wk3c@WK3C.COM]
>Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:15 PM
>To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
>Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Plenary
>
>I still vote disapprove, but I am inclined to support Roger's
>suggestion,
>which I think is elegant in its simplicity, with the following suggested
>change:
>
>I think that a year's notice may be a bit onerous for interims and
>wonder
>whether 6 months might be adequate notice.
>In my view, knowing 6 months in advance that an interim was going to be
>held
>and where seems to certainly be enough time to allow someone to plan to
>attend if they want to participate ...
>
>Regards,
>Carl
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 9:02 PM
> > To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> > Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Plenary
> >
> > I vote Disapprove. I will change my vote to Approve provided
> > the following changes are made:
> >
> > (1) Eliminate all of the P&P changes proposed in the ballot.
> >
> > (2) Specify that, in subclause 7.2.4.2.1 "Voting at Meeting,"
> > immediate after the sentence:
> >
> > "No quorum is required at meetings held in conjunction with
> > the Plenary session since the Plenary session time and place
> > is established well in advance."
> >
> > the following sentence shall be added:
> >
> > "Likewise, no quorum is required at interim sessions provided
> > that their time and place are established and publicly
> > announced at least one year in advance and that this
> > information is readily available to the public during that year."
> >
> > Roger
> >
> >
> > At 10:34 PM -0500 06/01/02, Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:
> > >Dear EC members,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Attached you will find the text for an LMSC P&P revision
> > ballot titled
> > >'WG Plenary'. This ballot was approved at the Friday
> > November 18, 2005
> > >EC meeting. The text is identical to that presented at the
> > meeting (but
> > >for one minor typo that has been corrected). The purpose
> > and rationale
> > >for the ballot are as given in the attached ballot document.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Ballot Duration: 1/2/2005 - 2/2/2005 @ 11:59 PM EST
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >WG/TAG chairs, please distribute this P&P revision ballot to your
> > >groups, and invite them to comment through you. Please direct any
> > >comments on this revision to the reflector for collection.
> > Note that I
> > >intend to hold a comment resolution telecon for this ballot
> > on 2/9/05 @
> > >12 PM EST. Further details will follow.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Thanks & Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Mat
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
> > >Senior Member Technical Staff
> > >BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
> > >Office: +1 973.633.6344
> > >email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
> > >
> >
> > ----------
> > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> > reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
> >
> >
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
>list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.