Re: [802SEC] Indemnification memo
While some additional example besides consultants could be added to make it clear that we aren't meaning to pick on them, I think we should remember that these are examples - they should be realistic and give people a more concrete idea of the principle they exemplify, but they are not meant to be complete. I don't think we could come up with a complete set.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Jerry1upton@AOL.COM>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Indemnification memo
> All,
> I completely agree with Bob Heile. We need a more complete and realistic
> set
> of examples or we should remove the current examples.
> Regards,
> Jerry Upton
>
> In a message dated 1/16/2006 12:35:50 PM Central Standard Time,
> bheile@ieee.org writes:
> In principal I agree with Bob but not with the memo as written. Either
> the
> examples should be removed or more realistic examples included. If
> examples
> are to be included, I would also like reference made to corporate venture
> arms which have significant investment in privately held companies making
> those companies and their voters beholding to the position of the
> investing
> corporation and reference made on the potential of manipulation on the
> part
> of companies who may have a significant buying relationship with another
> company, again giving the buying company the potential of controlling its
> vendor. Potential abuse through consultants pales in comparison to these
> far more efficient forms of manipulation and abuse. Only citing potential
> consultant abuse and ignoring the rest is degrading to this class and
> unfair in my view. Lets either cite the significant areas of potential
> abuse or cite none and talk only of the indemnification policy and
> behavior.
>
>
>
> At 09:59 AM 1/16/2006 -0800, Grow, Bob wrote:
>>Paul:
>>
>>I will forward to the 802.3 reflector. I think it would be appropriate
>>also to post this on the LMSC web pages (e.g., linked from
>>http://www.ieee802.org/devdocs.html), and WGs may choose to point to it
>>from their own pages.
>>
>>--Bob Grow
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Paul Nikolich [mailto:paul.nikolich@ATT.NET]
>>Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 3:53 PM
>>To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
>>Subject: [802SEC] Indemnification memo
>>
>>Dear EC Members,
>>
>>Please circulate the attached memo on indemnification to your Working
>>Group and Technical Advisory Group participants as soon as possible. As
>>you are all aware, this is an important subject that all members should
>>be aware of. If there are any questions, I will attempt address them
>>directly or solicit input from the appropriate legal resources in the
>>IEEE SA.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>--Paul Nikolich
>>
>>----------
>>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>>This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>
>>----------
>>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
>>list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>
>
> Bob Heile, Ph.D
> Chairman, ZigBee Alliance
> Chair, IEEE 802.15 Working Group on Wireless Personal Area Networks
> 11 Louis Road
> Attleboro, MA 02703 USA
> Mobile: +1-781-929-4832
> email: bheile@ieee.org
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.