Re: [802SEC] P802.3aq conditional approval satisfied
Roger:
Sorry, there were no invalid negatives either.
(And my appologies for the hard to read message also. That's what I get
for writing it during the Standards Board meeting.)
--Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:04 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] P802.3aq conditional approval satisfied
Bob,
I'd just like a bit of confirmation on one issue.
You noted that "no new valid negative votes were received." The
procedure requires the WG Chair to notify the EC of any invalid
negative votes, and the rationale for ruling any vote invalid. So,
can you confirm that there were no invalid negative votes either?
Roger
At 07:11 AM -0800 05/12/06, Grow, Bob wrote:
>Colleagues:
>
>The recirculation ballot of P802.3aq 5th recirculation ballot closed
>successfully on 5 December 2005. The 5th WG recirculation ballot
closed
>a few hours ago with the following results.
>
>The approval percentage increased with this recirculation to 89.34%.
>
>No technical changes have been made in creating the P802.3aq/D3.0
>initial Sponsor ballot draft from the last recirculated draft.
>
>No new valid negative votes were received in the recirculation and no
>comments of any kind were received.
>
>
>Therefore, all conditions have been met for progress of P802.3aq to
>Sponsor ballot have been satisfied and I will be opening the Sponsor
>ballot.
>
>--Bob Grow
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.