Re: [802SEC] Updated text for 'WG Membership & Meeting' P&P Revision
I support Tony's recommendations.
Carl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
> [mailto:matthew.sherman@BAESYSTEMS.COM]
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 2:16 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] Updated text for 'WG Membership &
> Meeting' P&P Revision
>
> If there are no objections by tomorrow evening, I will adopt Tony's
> recommendations.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Mat
>
>
>
> Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
> Senior Member Technical Staff
> BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
> Office: +1 973.633.6344
> email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
>
> _____
>
> From: Tony Jeffree [mailto:tony@jeffree.co.uk]
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 2:03 PM
> To: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
> Cc: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] Updated text for 'WG Membership & Meeting' P&P
> Revision
>
>
>
> At 23:53 13/11/2005, Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:
>
>
>
> Folks,
>
>
>
> As requested, I've modified the existing 'WG Membership &
> Meeting' P&P
> Revision to be against the most recently approved P&P (which should be
> posted shortly). No substantive changes have been made.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Mat
>
>
> Mat -
>
> The wording I have a problem with is as follows:
>
> "WG election procedures shall be defined within the WG P&P. Prior to
> their establishment, election procedures must be reviewed and approved
> by the EC before implementation."
>
> The first sentence mandates the existence of a WG P&P document;
> otherwise, the "shall" cannot be complied with.
>
> Yes, at some point, the SA will sick some set of model WG P&P on us;
> however, forcing all 802 WGs to establish P&P ahead of time, with the
> likelihood that the SA actions will cause us to re-work them later on,
> seems to be a gratuitous waste of all our time.
>
> Also, I see absolutely no rational reason why we should have N
> differently worded sets of election procedures for officer
> positions, so
> I can see no reason why this issue shouldn't be resolved by adding WG
> election procedures to the 802 P&P.
>
> My proposal is, therefore:
>
> 1) That both sentences in the above quoted text is removed from the
> existing P&P rules change; and
>
> 2) A separate rules change be initiated (which I am happy to do if you
> wish) to add WG officer election procedures to the 802 P&P.
>
> If either of those sentences stay in, I will vote against this change.
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.