Re: [802SEC] EC Membership and voting

["Bob O'Hara (boohara)" <boohara@CISCO.COM>]

Paul,

The "kerfuffle", as you say, and what is broken is that while Stuart is
on vacation, for the next six weeks, 500 voting members and an unholy
number of members that are not yet voting members of 802.11 have no
voice in the EC.  This essentially disenfranchises those members.

Why should that be allowed, when the possibility to deal with it simply
is available?  Why should a chair not be allowed to designate someone to
act in his/her stead, when the need arises?  The current LMSC P&P does
not prohibit that.

Presumably, we in the EC have confirmed that a vote was taken according
to required procedures when we confirm the election of a chair.  That
confirmation is not a confirmation that "joe is in the club (the EC)".
Joe is in the club because the election of his WG/TAG put him there.  It
is the WG/TAG that chooses who is in the EC, not us (well, except for
the appointed positions).

If that chair is operating with the consent of the WG and the chair
designates someone to proxy for him for a reason and for a temporary
period, who are we to say the WG and chair cannot do that?

When a chair "passes the gavel" during a meeting, the person now holding
that gavel is the chair.  How is this different?


 -Bob
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Nikolich [mailto:paul.nikolich@ATT.NET] 
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 3:37 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [802SEC] EC Membership and voting

Dear EC members,

The right to cast an EC vote is held by specific EC members is defined
in 
the P&P.  Gaining EC membership is defined in the P&P.

I don't understand the kerfuffle surrounding this topic.  In my view
nothing 
is broken in the P&P on this topic--let's not try to fix it.

--Paul


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pat Thaler" <pat_thaler@AGILENT.COM>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [802SEC] EC Membership and voting


> And here is the message with my view on the subject:
>
> The rules are clear. The voting position on the Exec belongs to the 
> Working Group chair (once confirmed or appointed).
>
> If you want to change that, it would require a rules change. I would
be 
> against such a rules change. I think consistency/continuity in our 
> membership is important. If it was officially stated that the vote
could 
> be used by a vice chair in place of the chair, I'm concerned that
Chairs 
> might fairly regularly send their vice chair to the EC in their place 
> which would lose continuity.
>
> With the rules as they are, we get very good Working Group Chair 
> attendance.
>
> By the way, I also think that if we must continue this discussion, it 
> should move to the EC reflector where it is visible. We have drifted
well 
> off the contract matters that required private discussion.
>
> Regards,
> Pat
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob O'Hara (boohara) [mailto:boohara@CISCO.COM]
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 1:32 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: [802SEC] EC Membership and voting
>
> Taking this to the reflector for more open discussion of the issue.
>
> This is a very important issue and needs to be discussed.  I don't
think
> that precedent is sufficient to "decide" this matter.
>
> I disagree with all that have said that membership on the EC is held
by
> an individual.  It is not.  Membership in 802 is a right held by
> individual.  Membership on the EC is held by a position.  No
individual
> is selected by any means for membership on the EC.  Individual 802
> members are selected for a position, either by their WG/TAG or by
> confirmation of an appointment by the LMSC chair.  It is the position
> that holds the voting right on the EC, not the individual.  Clause
7.1.2
> in the P&P is very clear on this point.
>
> A simple example will serve to illustrate this.  I am currently the
> Recording Secretary and able to vote in the EC.  If I were to resign
> that position, even though I am still an individual member of 802 and
> 802.11, I would no longer be able to vote in the EC.  The confirmation
> of my appointment to the position of Recording Secretary made me able
to
> vote, not the fact that I, as an individual, was confirmed as an
> abstract "member of the EC".
>
> The P&P discuss "succession" in only one specific case, when an
election
> or appointment is not confirmed by the EC.  It does not apply to this
> situation.
>
> If a WG/TAG chair has their own P&P allow them the power to appoint
> someone to act in their absence or incapacity and our P&P are silent
on
> the topic, is that appointed person now the "chair" for all intents
and
> purposes under our P&P?
>
> I would say we are in an ambiguous situation.  Precedent may make one
> feel comfortable.  But, it is not a defense for an appeal and it is
not
> sufficient to close this issue.
>
> Personally, I think that an elected chair should be able to have their
> WG/TAG represented on the EC in their absence or incapacity.  Why
would
> we want anything different?  Do we really want to silence a WG of more
> than 500 voting members, simply because the chair is on vacation?
>
> -Bob
>
> Bob O'Hara
> Cisco Systems - WNBU
>
> Phone:  +1 408 853 5513
> Mobile: +1 408 218 4025
>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This 
> list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This 
> list is maintained by Listserv. 

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.