Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Five day approval process

Carl,

We did as you previously did - we had an enabling motion at the July
Plenary to allow work in this meeting. All those here felt that was
sufficient. If that does not satisfy you please advise how this is
different on how you conducted .18 business at an interim.

The document was approved by all. Our two new participants, representing
Qualcomm, contributed and did not seem to have any issues.

Regards,

Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: Carl R. Stevenson [mailto:wk3c@wk3c.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 09:42
To: Lynch, Michael [RICH1:2H50:EXCH]; STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: RE: [802SEC] Five day approval process


Mike,

Do you have a quorum in Geneva?

If so, was this document approved by 75% of the members, per the P&P?


Regards,
Carl 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Lynch [mailto:mjlynch@NORTEL.COM]
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 11:03 AM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: [802SEC] Five day approval process
> 
> Please find enclosed 802.18's comments in response to the European 
> Commission 2.6 GHz consultation. The comment period closes 15 
> September but the membership believes it is beneficial to file a 
> response. This was approved by unanimous consent.
> I would like to be able to forward this the European Commission on 25
> September. 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mike
> 
> +1 972 814 4901
> 
>  <<18-05-0033-r0-0000-EC_2.6GHz_Band_Consultation Response.doc>>
> 
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.
> 

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.