Re: [802SEC] FW: Quorum
Mat,
Given that the purpose of a Quorum is to make sure a significant
number of voters are in attendance, I am not sure this works. If you
have half your regular attendance, which may be about half your voters,
you only have 25% of your voters in attendance. Is that really okay?
Keep in mind, we can always send out an email ballot after the meeting.
Another idea I heard Jerry suggest was to fix the current P&P so
that we can empower an interim at the previous plenary. I guess it is
currently broken.
I thought I was overwhelmed with your P&P changes. Looks like
you keep coming up with new ones. I assume these would be balloted
electronically.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
[mailto:matthew.sherman@baesystems.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:02 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [802SEC] FW: Quorum
Take 2 (with proprietary footer removed)....
Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:58 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: FW: Quorum
Folks,
Mark Klerer suggested the rules change below. I think it's a good idea
and I am thinking of fronting it for him.
Comments?
Mat
Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Klerer, Mark [mailto:M.Klerer@flarion.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:26 PM
To: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
Subject: Quorum
Matt
An idea on quorum rules:
In order to solve the quorum problem at interims I would and have
suggested that quorum be defined as 50% of the average number of
Participant members during the last 4 meetings (interim and plenary).
One could play around with whether it should be 3 or 4 meetings.
This will have the effect of more acurately reflecting acting and
ongoing participation and will not disenfranchise anyone.
Mark
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
-----Original Message-----
From: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) <matthew.sherman@BAESYSTEMS.COM>
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Thu Jul 21 22:20:56 2005
Subject: [802SEC] LMSC Officer identification on Name Tags
Folks,
I've noticed that these days different groups follow different practices
about identifying the officers of their groups. I'm of the opinion that
identifying officers is generally a good idea. It makes it easier for
people to know who to talk to when they are not on stage. I plan to
make a motion tomorrow that name badges for LMSC plenary sessions
identify LMSC officers at the WG level and above. Any thoughts on that?
Mat
Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.