Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Membership & Meeting P&P
Bob,
I agree qualifying members based on some measure of their ability to
contribute to the WG work is difficult and may be impossible. But it seems
like a reasonable objective. Ideally I want all our members fully engaged
in developing the best possible standards for 802.
The intent of my comment was to start discussion around establishing a
membership requirement that ensures that members are active and contributing
to the standards development process. If a participant is not engaged, for
whatever reason, should they be given the privelege of membership? The
intent of the 75% participation requirement is an attempt to quantify some
level of 'engagement'. But what about those cases in which a person shows
up enough to meet the attendance requirement, but they do not participate in
the WG work. Should they be eligible to cast votes that will influence the
WG work?
Regards,
--Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob O'Hara" <bob.ohara@CISCO.COM>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Membership &
Meeting P&P
> Whoooeee, Paul! You want the WG chair to review the resumes of every
> candidate for WG membership? Do they have to verify that the information
> is
> correct? If so, does 802. fund that activity? What background is
> appropriate? Does it require a technical degree, or is a BS in business
> administration sufficient?
>
> I think this is a tar pit!
>
>
> -Bob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org] On
> Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 2:24 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Membership &
> Meeting P&P
>
> Matt,
>
> My vote is disapprove. Resolution of my comments will change my vote to
> approve.
>
> 1) 7.2.2 ...An individual who has served as Chair or Vice Chair of a given
> Working Group for a total of more than eight years in that office may not
> run for election be elected to that office again, unless approved by a 75%
> vote of the Working Group....
>
> The above is ambiguous. Does it mean a motion to allow a current WG Chair
> to participate in an election must be approved by 75% -OR- a current WG
> Chair can continue to serve if they receive 75% of the vote in an
> election?
>
> 2) 7.2.3.1 Membership Establishiment
> When exactly does one become a member at the initial plenary session of a
> WG? At the time they cross the 75% attendance threshold? I think
> so--this
> should be stated.
>
> 3) 7.2.3.1 Membership Establishiment
> I think the letter of intent and declaration of affliation should be
> mandatory. At the option of the member, the declaration of affliation
> kept
> confidential among EC members.
>
> 4) 7.2.3.1 Membership Establishiment
> Item for discussion among EC members--this comment is not part of my vote.
> I think an additional requirement should be placed on achieving WG
> membership: active participation and proven expertise relative to the WG
> charter as demonstrated by a resume or educational background.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)" <matthew.sherman@BAESYSTEMS.COM>
> To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 10:11 AM
> Subject: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Membership & Meeting
> P&P
>
>
> Dear EC members,
>
> Attached you will find the text for an LMSC P&P revision ballot on WG
> Membership & Meeting Policies and Procedures. This ballot was approved
> at the Friday March 18, 2005 EC meeting. The text is identical to that
> presented at the meeting (but changes have been highlighted). The
> purpose and rationale for the ballot are as given in the attached ballot
> document.
>
> Ballot Duration: 5/2/2005 - 6/2/2005 @ 11:59 PM EST
>
> WG/TAG chairs, please distribute this P&P revision ballot to your
> groups, and invite them to comment through you. Please direct any
> comments on this revision to the reflector for collection.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Mat
>
>
>
> <<802.0-EC_Voting_Rules-P&P_Revision_ballot.pdf>>
>
>
>
> Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
> Senior Member Technical Staff
> BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
> Office: +1 973.633.6344
> email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.