----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:41
AM
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Five day approval
process
Roger,
The decision to work on this
response by conference call was taken at the closing session of 802.18 in
Atlanta. The call details (bridge number and dates of the first two calls)
were agreed at that meeting. The entire TAG was notified prior to each of
the calls and furnished the then current working draft. During the second
call it was decided to have a third and final call which and the TAG was
notified. In response to that notice (and final draft) comments were
received from one individual and considered on the third call. The completed
response was then circulated to the TAG for further comments.
There was no vote taken and the
comments represent the consensus of those who participated. After the final
version was circulated there was only one response and that simply asked if
that person's comments had been considered since he didn't join the
conference call (they were considered and for the most part
accepted).
Since this is a consensus document
created by those in the TAG that decided to participate in developing the
comments. While no formal vote was taken it would seem that silence by the
TAG after the final document was circulated is assent to the
document.
Glad to discuss. Connection to the
internet here at the CITEL meeting in Guatemala City is not so good but I
will check email as often as I can.
Regards,
Mike
972 814 4901 through 21 May
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 14:02
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Five day approval process
A five-day review under Procedure 14.2 should
include a report of the WG or TAG voting results, since the procedure
specifies a minimum:
Procedure 14.2: Working Group or TAG
communications with government bodies shall not be released without prior
approval by a 75% majority of the Working Group or TAG. Such communications
may proceed unless blocked by an EC vote. For position statements not
presented for review in an EC meeting, EC members shall have a review period
of at least five days; if, during that time, a motion to block it is made,
release of the position statement will be withheld until the motion
fails.
Roger
>I will let Mike answer definitively for
himself, but in the past, this
>has
just been the 5 day EC pre-filing review and the doc would go as a
>.18 filing. (if nobody makes a motion
to block filing within the 5 day window, Mike can file it as a .18 document,
per the P&P)
>
>Regards,
>Carl
>
>
>
>From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Shellhammer, Stephen J
>Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 10:17 PM
>To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: Re: [802SEC] Five day approval process
>
>Mike,
>
>
Is your email intended to initiate an EC vote on this
> 802.18 document? If so would it then become an
802 document versus an
> 802.18
document?
>
>Regards,
>Steve
>_________________
>Steve
Shellhammer
>Intel Corporation
>(858) 391-4570
>
>From:
owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Michael Lynch
>Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 1:28 PM
>To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: [802SEC] Five day approval process
>
>Dear EC
members,
>Please find enclosed
802.18's comments in response to the Canadian UWB
>consultation. The comment period closes 6 May. During
our 18 March
>closing EC meeting I
indicated that 802.18 would work on a response to
>the Canadian consultation by conference calls and
correspondence. This
>document is the
result of that effort. I would like to be able to forward this to Industry
Canada on 2 May. Regards, Mike
>+1 972 684 7518 (ESN 444 7518) Voice
>+1 972 684 3774 (ESN 444 3775) FAX
>+1 972 814 4901 (ESN 450 9401) Mobile
><<802.18-05.0017-02-0000_RR-TAG_Draft_IC_Comments.doc>>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.