Re: [802SEC] Five day approval process
Roger is, of course, correct.
However, we should modify the relevant section(s) of the P&P to avoid the
use of the term "position statements," as that term has special meaning to
the IEEE and IEEE-SA and should be avoided.
Carl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org
> [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of
> Roger B. Marks
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 3:02 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] Five day approval process
>
> A five-day review under Procedure 14.2 should include a
> report of the WG or TAG voting results, since the procedure
> specifies a minimum:
>
> Procedure 14.2: Working Group or TAG communications with
> government bodies shall not be released without prior
> approval by a 75% majority of the Working Group or TAG. Such
> communications may proceed unless blocked by an EC vote. For
> position statements not presented for review in an EC
> meeting, EC members shall have a review period of at least
> five days; if, during that time, a motion to block it is
> made, release of the position statement will be withheld
> until the motion fails.
>
> Roger
>
>
> >I will let Mike answer definitively for himself, but in the
> past, this has just been the 5 day EC pre-filing review and
> the doc would go as a .18 filing.
> >(if nobody makes a motion to block filing within the 5 day
> window, Mike
> >can file it as a .18 document, per the P&P)
> >
> >Regards,
> >Carl
> >
> >
> >
> >From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> >[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of
> Shellhammer,
> >Stephen J
> >Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 10:17 PM
> >To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> >Subject: Re: [802SEC] Five day approval process
> >
> >Mike,
> >
> > Is your email intended to initiate an EC vote on
> this 802.18 document? If so would it then become an 802
> document versus an 802.18 document?
> >
> >Regards,
> >Steve
> >_________________
> >Steve Shellhammer
> >Intel Corporation
> >(858) 391-4570
> >
> >From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> >[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Michael
> >Lynch
> >Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 1:28 PM
> >To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> >Subject: [802SEC] Five day approval process
> >
> >Dear EC members,
> >Please find enclosed 802.18's comments in response to the
> Canadian UWB consultation. The comment period closes 6 May.
> During our 18 March closing EC meeting I indicated that
> 802.18 would work on a response to the Canadian consultation
> by conference calls and correspondence. This document is the
> result of that effort.
> >I would like to be able to forward this to Industry Canada on 2 May.
> >Regards,
> >Mike
> >+1 972 684 7518 (ESN 444 7518) Voice
> >+1 972 684 3774 (ESN 444 3775) FAX
> >+1 972 814 4901 (ESN 450 9401) Mobile
> ><<802.18-05.0017-02-0000_RR-TAG_Draft_IC_Comments.doc>>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
> reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.