Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ENDS 29 MAR+++ motion to approve contribution to ITU-R
I approve.
I leave it to the concerned parties to decide whether to retain or remove the sentence about 802.20 though I prefer the edit suggested by Bob O'Hara. That edit removes the speculative about possible future submission to working party 8A making it a straight statement of fact. It does not imply that 802.20 approved the submission since an earlier paragraph clearly states that 802.16 prepared and approved the submission.
I agree with the nit about the draft reference - Drafts are suffixed by Dx.y not 200?. I expect the reference was written as it is because it is a proposed starting point for a document that is expected to complete after 802.16e is a standard. It would be better (less confusing) to retain the draft reference format until 802.16e is approved.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG]On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
Sent: Saturday, 19 March, 2005 9:00 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ENDS 29 MAR+++ motion to approve
contribution to ITU-R
Dear EC Members,
This is a email ballot to make a determination on the below motion.
Motion: "To approve IEEE 802.16-05/028r2 with the intent to submit to ITU-R
as an IEEE contribution, subject to editorial revision."
Moved: Roger Marks
Second: Mike Lynch
The ballot opens noon ET Saturday 19 March 2005 and closes Tuesday 29 March
2005.
Regards,
--Paul Nikolich
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@ieee.org>
To: <p.nikolich@ieee.org>
Cc: <mjlynch@NORTELNETWORKS.COM>; <costa@nortel.com>
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 6:40 PM
Subject: request for 10-day EC ballot
> Paul,
>
> I request a 10-day EC ballot on the following motion:
>
> "To approveas an intended contribution from
> IEEE to ITU-R, subject to editorial revision".
>
> The document title is "Proposed Working Document towards a
> Preliminary Draft New Recommendation ITU-R M.[8A/BWA]".
>
> This issue was deferred from a motion at the EC meeting today.
>
> Mr. Lynch seconds the motion.
>
> Regards,
>
> Roger
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.