Re: [802SEC] Proposed rules change - 7.5 Balloting groups
Matt -
Wouldn't it just be simpler, instead of having one ballot delete the
paragraph and a second put it back in a different form, for you to replace
the deleted paragraph in your ballot with the text that I proposed? I don't
object to running a separate ballot if you insist this is necessary, but it
just seems to be over complicating the process.
Regards,
Tony
At 16:10 17/03/2005, Sherman, Matthew J. \(US SSA\) wrote:
>Tony,
>
>I wish to call your attention the proposed ballot titled 'LMSC
>Organization' that ML and I crafted last night. It happens that the
>paragraph you are editing, we have completely eliminated. The rationale
>for this is that the Model Sponsor P&P is deleting this subcluase
>completely. We are preserving the subclause because we are making other
>additions.
>
>I do not oppose your P&P ballot. However, it would be convenient for me
>if you can show the paragraph as being completely deleted, and then
>added (modified as you like) as new text. In the end, we will all know
>what we mean, but I think the editing instructions will be clearer this
>way given we are both trying to modify the same section.
>
>Let me know what you think.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mat
>
>Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
>Senior Member Technical Staff
>BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
>Office: +1 973.633.6344
>email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Tony Jeffree
>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 3:15 PM
>To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: Re: [802SEC] Proposed rules change - 7.5 Balloting groups
>
>Bob -
>
>That is a good point; I prefer the first version, and have used that to
>change my proposed text (see attached).
>
>Regards,
>Tony
>
>At 18:50 15/03/2005, Grow, Bob wrote:
> >Tony:
> >
> >Your change naturally made me reread something that I believe was wrong
> >to begin with. One does not have to be a member of anything to
> >participate in a ballot if they choose to pay the ballot fee.
> >Therefore, I would recommend a change to eliminate the SA membership
> >restriction.
> >
> >"All members of Balloting Groups established for Sponsor balloting of
> >IEEE 802 drafts shall be individuals that meet the participation
> >reqirements of IEEE-SA unless otherwise requested . . ."
> >
> >Or
> >
> >"All PARs for IEEE 802 projects shall specify that balloting will be
> >individual unless otherwise requested . . ."
> >
> >--Bob
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> >[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Tony Jeffree
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:30 AM
> >To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> >Subject: [802SEC] Proposed rules change - 7.5 Balloting groups
> >
> >I took a look at the current P&P with respect to the Monday motion on
> >individual membership/balloting. The existing text is clear on
> >membership
> >of the LMSC being on an individual, non-transferable basis; however,
> >clause
> >7.5 which refers to the formation of balloting groups should be made
> >specific on this point, i.e., only individual members of the SA can
> >become
> >part of a balloting group. The subclause also needed some fixing up in
> >general.
> >
> >Therefore, I would like to initiate a rules change ballot as indicated
> >by
> >the attached Word text, to fix up 7.5.
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >Tony
> >
> >----------
> >This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> >This list is maintained by Listserv.
> >
> >----------
> >This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>This
> >list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>Regards,
>Tony
>
>----------
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>This list is maintained by Listserv.
Regards,
Tony
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.