Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ P&P_Revision_Process +++ Proposed Resoution

Title: Message
Mat,
 
I have two further comments on the revised text.
 
In 7.1.6.4, there is a new parenthetical phrase that talks about the presence of EC members.  I still object to the creation of a new way to vote, off the record, against a P&P change.  This new voting method requires an EC member to simply walk out of the room.  Their absence is now counted as a vote against the motion.  If this is the intent of the new text, it should be explicitly stated that we are adding this new way of voting  on a motion.
 
In 7.1.6.5, you have added a new, final sentence.  I believe the language here is very confused.  Perhaps a better way to say this (if I correctly understand what your aim is) would be: "Any voting member of the EC may object, within 30 days of the publication of an editorial change to the P&P, that the editorial change is actually substantive.  In the event of this objection, the editorial change will be considered to be without effect and the previous text, if any, will remain in force."

 -Bob
 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 8:33 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ P&P_Revision_Process +++ Proposed Resoution

All,

Attached please find a proposed resolution for the P&P Revision Ballot on the P&P Revision Process.  It addressed all comments received to date, and agreements reached in the comment resolution session held on 1/7/05.  Please review and let me know if there are further comments.

Bob Grow,

I modified some of your original proposed test to be more consistent with what I believed your intentions were.  Please let me know if the text I used was okay or I should modify it.  This is particularly true for clause 7.1.4.

Thanks to all,

Mat

<<802.0-P&P_Revision_Process-Proposed_P&P_Balot_resoution1.pdf>>

Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.

Senior Member Technical Staff

BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR

Office: +1 973.633.6344

email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.