Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ENDS 13 JAN+++motion to hold plenary sessions outside NA
Bill, I understand your point and am not looking to make more work for Matt, but it seems to me that the type of host and/or co-host that would be defined in our P&Ps is rapidly becoming an extinct species, and more and more they are becoming like what I am proposing for the International Session Hosts (entities which may co-sponsor but do not assume full financial responsibility for the session), so perhaps it would make sense to correct our definitions in the P&Ps to allow for either type of hosting entity (or maybe change to the new type), but to at least allow our International Hosts to be described as "Hosts" without undue confusion. I think we often overdo it with putting too much specificity in our P&Ps and wind up creating unnecessary confusion and conflicts for ourselves. A Host is a Host whether they provide full-financial, partial-financial, or non-financial (logistical-only) support and we should not have to invent new words for a concept that is well known ju!
st because of some language in our P&Ps.
Partnerships have their own set of legal ramifications that I would just a soon not choose to open Pandora's Box on.
Thanx, Buzz
Dr. Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
Boeing - SSG
PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
Seattle, WA 98124-2207
(425) 865-2443 Fx: (425) 865-6721
Cell: (425) 417-1022
everett.o.rigsbee@boeing.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Quackenbush [mailto:quackenbush@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 11:47 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ENDS 13 JAN+++motion to hold plenary sessions outside NA
Buzz,
Given that the LMSC P&P very specifically defines the roll of a session "host" or "cohost", I suggest that it would be desirable to use a different word for the organizational entity with which the LMSC partners to put on a session outside of the North America if that entity is not is not a "host" or "cohost" as defined in the P&P. "Sponsor" is a possibility, but there is a potential ambiguity here between the "sponsor of a session" and the "sponsor of a standard". The the term "partner" comes to mind as a possibility. I don't recall that "partner" has any IEEE defined meaning. And there are other possibilities.
wlq
-----Original Message-----
Subject:
Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ENDS 13 JAN+++motion to hold plenary sessions outside NA
Date:
Wed, 29 Dec 2004 20:06:40 -0800
From:
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.