Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
I
oppose this motion with the following comments:
1) I should say I support the notion, but not the
motion :-) I agree we should strive
to become a truly international standards
body.
2) As worded, the motion denies our meeting
planners the flexibility they reasonably need. Applying a forcing function is
inefficient and arbitrary. Why can't we skip a year for logistical and cost
reasons if common sense would indicate that is thing to do? Would we
hold a meeting somewhere no-one in their right mind would, just to
adhere to this rule? Let's consider venues and costs as they come up and
use our common sense to approve or not. So who's common sense apply? See
point #3.
3) I believe such a motion is unnecessary. This
committee approves each and every session location. When international
venue proposals come up (including costs, logistical considerations, etc...) all
we have to do is vote accordingly. (If the motion were to instruct the meeting
planners to come up with such proposals, I would be
inclined to support. But it's not)
4) I
believe such a motion is un-enforceable. What if we don't pull this off in
some future year? Can someone declare our proceedings "out of order" and our
decisions invalid if we don't adhere to the letter of this rule? Can the EC be
somehow impeached? Who gets sued?
5) I believe the earlier points made about expense and
logistical challenges remain valid and that many of our members do care about
them. Various hand-waiving arguments don't make those go away. When
faced with a proposal for venue X and attendance fee Y, we should be accountable
and not hide behind a motion ("we had to because back in 2005 we had a
motion...." )
Pat's
idea of putting out a call for hosts is a good one if nothing else to gauge the
true level of interest in this course of action.
john
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. |