[802SEC] +++EC MOTION WITHDRAWL+++ ENDS 22 OCT+++Approval of IEEE P802.11p news release
Dear EC members,
Stuart Kerry has requested the below motion be withdrawn for the reasons
given below. Unless there are any objections to withdrawing the motion,
within the next 24 hours (time expires 9pm ET 22 October), the motion will
be withdrawn.
Regards,
--Paul Nikolich
Rationale for withdrawing the motion from Lee Armstrong, chair of 802.11p:
Paul,
In further consideration of the proposed press release for 11p, the lawyers
that have been representing DSRC to the FCC voiced concerns that indicate we
should probably table this item for now. I talked to Stuart Kerry about it
and he concurs.
As background, the FCC has allocated the 5.850-5.925 GHz band for DSRC, with
rulemaking that requires all devices using this band be compliant with the
existing ASTM E2213-03 standard. This ASTM standard was written similar to
an amendment to IEEE 802.11, with obvious changes since it is neither an
IEEE standard nor can actually be written as an actual amendment. The entire
FCC process, from initial petition to the current status of licenses being
granted, was based on a band use rule requiring all devices to be compliant
with this ASTM standard. The intent, and what was agreed between ASTM and
IEEE and identified in the PAR, was that once the 802.11p was finalized, the
ASTM standard would be withdrawn and the FCC would be petitioned to modify
the ruling to reference the 11p standard instead.
We made it clear to the FCC early in the process that we wanted to
transition from the ASTM standard to an equivalent IEEE 802.11 standard as
soon as possible, but this was never heavily emphasized as we didn't want to
add further confusion to the process.
The problem we now have with the press release is that
a.) It doesn't mention the ASTM standard. The concern here is that someone
familiar with the current FCC ruling may not realize that this meant to be
the replacement for the ASTM standard. It would not be a different standard
that would also be used in the band. It needs to be clear that while this
will ultimately replace the ASTM standard, there will be complete
compatibility between the two (devices built to the ASTM standard will still
be compliant with 802.11p). I have attached a version where I added a few
words that may satisfy this need without going into detail that would
detract from the primary goal of the release.
b.) Almost all of the FCC staff that were working on it when we were
telling them about these plans have left and those few remaining may not
have ready recollection of being briefed on this. We don't want to agitate
the current staff by seeing the press release and thinking that this is a
totally new thing we are doing. The lawyers want to have time to talk to
them to be sure that there are no problems with it when it does appear.
I wasn't too worried about it when I read the draft, as I was sure that the
FCC staff and all others that have been involved would be aware of the
relationship between 802.11p and the existing ASTM standard. Some others,
especially the lawyers, felt that further clarification was necessary. I
wasn't aware of the extent of the FCC staff turnover which could make it
sensitive if they are not properly briefed in advance.
In light of this, we fell that it is best to delay this press release and
thus table the motion until we can get further input from the lawyers
working with the FCC.
Regards,
Lee Armstrong
Armstrong Consulting, Inc.
454 Walnut Street
Newton, MA 02460
(P) 617 244 9203
(F) 617 244 9204
(C) 617 620 1701
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:20 PM
Subject: [802SEC] +++EC MOTION+++ ENDS 22 OCT+++Approval of IEEE P802.11p
news release
> Dear EC Members,
>
> This is an email ballot of 10 day duration on the following motion:
>
> To approve the attached press release prepared by IEEE-SA staff announcing
> the approval of the P802.11p PAR.
> Moved: Stuart Kerry
> Second: Bob Heile
>
> It opens 11PM edt 12OCT and closes 11PM edt 22 October.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Paul Nikolich
> IEEE 802 Chairman
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <stuart.kerry@philips.com>
> To: <p.nikolich@ieee.org>
> Cc: <k.mccabe@ieee.org>; <apetrick@icefyre.com>; <bheile@ieee.org>;
> <hworstell@att.com>; <lra@tiac.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 8:51 PM
> Subject: RE: RE: IEEE P802.11p news release
>
>
>>
>> Paul,
>>
>> It looks fine to me with Karen's tidy up work. Please start the motion in
>> the 802 ExCom.
>>
>> As previously stated Bob Heile seconds this motion.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Stuart
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> Stuart J. Kerry
>>
>> Chair, IEEE 802.11 WLANs WG
>>
>>
>>
>> Philips Semiconductors, Inc.
>>
>> 1109 McKay Drive, M/S 48A SJ,
>>
>> San Jose, CA 95131-1706,
>>
>> United States of America.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ph : +1 (408) 474-7356
>>
>> Fax: +1 (408) 474-5343
>>
>> Cell: +1 (408) 348-3171
>>
>> eMail: stuart.kerry@philips.com
>>
>> _______________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: k.mccabe@ieee.org [mailto:k.mccabe@ieee.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 5:25 PM
>> To: Stuart Kerry; apetrick@icefyre.com
>> Cc: p.nikolich@ieee.org
>> Subject: Re: Fw: IEEE P802.11p news release
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>> We gave the release a good editorial scrub and attached is the clean
>> version. Please note, since we have described/qualified IEEE P802.11p as
>> a
>> "standard development project" and " a draft standard amendment" under
>> development in the first two paragraphs of the release, we can
>> comfortably
>> refer (and in proper PR style) to it as "IEEE P802.11p" in the remainder
>> of
>> the release--to stay consistent, streamlined and avoid introducing
>> confusion by limiting interchanging "standard development project" and
>> "draft standard amendment" as qualifiers (the use of these was getting a
>> bit overwhelming)--especially since the remainder of the release couches
>> the standard project in terms of being under development, etc.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Karen
>>
>> (See attached file: PR_P802.11pV3.doc)
>>
>> Karen McCabe
>> Senior Marketing Manager, IEEE Standards
>> 445 Hoes Lane, PO Box 1331
>> Piscataway NJ 08855 USA
>> PH: +1 732 562 3824
>> email: k.mccabe@ieee.org
>> http://standards.ieee.org
>> Think Standards! Think IEEE!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Paul Nikolich"
>>
>> <paul.nikolich@at To:
>> <k.mccabe@ieee.org>, <stuart.kerry@philips.com>
>>
>> t.net> cc:
>>
>> Subject: Fw: IEEE P802.11p
>> news release
>> 10/12/2004 02:08
>>
>> PM
>>
>> Please respond to
>>
>> "Paul Nikolich"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Karen,
>>
>> Please give this PR once last editorial scrub, create a new clean
>> version,
>> and send it to Stuart for review.
>>
>> Stuart, once you approve the clean version, please try to get an EC
>> seconder
>> and I'll issue the EC ballot.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --Paul
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: <stuart.kerry@philips.com>
>> To: <p.nikolich@ieee.org>; <k.mccabe@ieee.org>
>> Cc: <lra@tiac.net>; <brian@linux-wlan.com>; <apetrick@icefyre.com>;
>> <hworstell@att.com>
>> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 4:41 PM
>> Subject: RE: IEEE P802.11p news release
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Paul and Karen,
>>>
>>> I have modified the press release to show that the contact for the
>> working
>>> group is the WG Chair only. With that done, I am happy with the rest of
>>> the release. Therefore I move this motion to you as the 802 ExCom Chair,
>>> and for you to call for a second to begin discussion and subsequent
>>> approval process in an 802 ExCom Electronic Ballot of the committee
>>> members.
>>>
>>> / Stuart
>>>
>>> P.S. Modified release attached
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Paul Nikolich [mailto:paul.nikolich@att.net]
>>> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 10:11 AM
>>> To: k.mccabe@ieee.org; p.nikolich@ieee.org
>>> Cc: lra@tiac.net; stuart@ok-brit.com; brian@linux-wlan.com
>>> Subject: Re: IEEE P802.11p news release
>>>
>>> Karen,
>>>
>>> Before we send this out to the EC for approval I made several
>> corrections
>>> and added a quote from me. The corrections are mostly making sure to
>> the
>>> reader that it is clear that a PROJECT was approved to develop a DRAFT
>>> STANDARD. We need to be careful in the future to ensure we maintain
>> this
>>> distinction in future releases of approved projects.
>>>
>>> If I have not included all the right people on this email for review and
>>> approval of my suggested changes, please include the necessary
>> individuals
>>>
>>> and then resubmit the request for an EC motion to me.
>>>
>>> Also, just to be clear, the EC motion needs to be made and seconded by 2
>>> EC
>>> members (typically the WG Chair and another). I cannot begin a ballot
>>> without that.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> --Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: <k.mccabe@ieee.org>
>>> To: <p.nikolich@ieee.org>
>>> Cc: <lra@tiac.net>; <stuart@ok-brit.com>; <brian@linux-wlan.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 10:36 AM
>>> Subject: IEEE P802.11p news release
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Paul,
>>>> Working with Lee Armstrong we have developed a news release on the
>> start
>>>
>>>> on
>>>> the IEEE 802.11p standard. It's attached and "ready" for the EC
>> approval
>>>> process.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Karen
>>>>
>>>> (See attached file: PR_P802.11pV1.doc)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Karen McCabe
>>>> Senior Marketing Manager, IEEE Standards
>>>> 445 Hoes Lane, PO Box 1331
>>>> Piscataway NJ 08855 USA
>>>> PH: +1 732 562 3824
>>>> email: k.mccabe@ieee.org
>>>> http://standards.ieee.org
>>>> Think Standards! Think IEEE!
>>>>
>>>
>> (See attached file: SJK Modified PR_P802 11pV2.doc)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
> list is maintained by Listserv.
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.