| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear EC members, The ballot on “Compliance
with IEEE-SA and IEEE CS Governance” is now closed. The results are: TOTALS: DIS DNV
APP ABS
-00- -11- -05- -00- The ballot fails due to lack
of response. Details on the results and comments are provided below.
Please let me know if you see any errors. There will be comment resolution
for this ballot on Sunday 11/14/04 @ 6 PM. All EC members are encouraged
to attend. Thanks & Regards, Mat Matthew
Sherman, PhD Vice Chair, IEEE 802 Senior Member Technical Staff BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR Mail Stop 11B01 Office: +1 973.633.6344 Cell: +1 973.229.9520 Fax: +1 973.633.6004 email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com Voters
DNV DIS DNV
APP ABS Comments
Provided? --------------------------------------------------------- 00 01 Mat 02 Howard
Frazier DNV 03 Buzz
Rigsbee DNV 04 Bob
O'Hara DNV 05 John Hawkins APP Yes 06 Tony
Jeffree
APP
No 07 Bob
Grow DNV 08 Stuart
Kerry DNV 09 Bob
Heile DNV 10 Roger
Marks DNV 11 Mike
Takefman DNV 12 Carl
Stevenson
APP No 13 Steve
Shellhammer DNV 14 Jerry
Upton DNV 15 Ajay
Rajkumar DNV ---+++---+++---+++---+++---+++---+++---+++---+++---+++--- TOTALS DIS
DNV APP ABS total: -00- -11- -05- -00- Ballot
Comments: John Hawkins
[jhawkins@nortelnetworks.com] Mon
10/11/2004 10:36 AM Question: what's next? Are we done? Or is this just
getting us into conformance, and the real heavy lifting is yet to come? (or
something else?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note that I have voted
"approve" with comments. I have additional recommended changes that I
feel are required to be in full conformance with IEEE-SA / IEEE CS
governance. I have attached a PowerPoint file that summarizes my efforts,
and a marked up draft of our current P&P that includes the changes I am
proposing at this time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PreBallot Comments (I
believe these were accommodated in the balloted wording of the text): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stevenson, Carl R (Carl)
[carlstevenson@AGERE.COM]
Tue 7/20/2004 1:28 PM Geoff's comments are good,
and I would echo them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Geoff Thompson
[gthompso@nortelnetworks.com]
Mon 7/19/2004 1:11 AM I feel that the text that
opens things up completely could be used against us. Therefore, please consider
the following change (If I had a vote it would be DISAPPROVE to get this change
in.) From: "These Operating
Procedures outline the orderly transaction of business of this committee. For
the development of standards, openness and due process must apply, which means
that any individual with a direct and material interest has a right to
participate by: a) expressing a position and
its basis, b) having that position
considered, and c) appealing if adversely
affected. Due process allows for
equity and fair play. In addition to openness, due process requires balance,
i.e., the standards development process should have a balance of interests and
shall not be dominated by any single interest category." To: "These Operating
Procedures outline the orderly transaction of business of this committee. For
the development of standards, openness and due process must apply, which means
that any individual with a direct and material interest, who meets the participation
requirements has a right to participate by: a) expressing a position and
its basis, b) having that position
considered, and c) appealing if adversely
affected. Due process allows for
equity and fair play. In addition to openness, due process requires balance,
i.e., the standards development process should have a balance of interests and
shall not be dominated by any single interest category." Else we could have folks
claiming they can either ballot or walk in and speak without going through the
normal requirements (which are not discriminatory) of either meeting
registration requirements or joining the ballot pool/group. I think we can add this text
with no problem with the IEEE. Matthew
Sherman, PhD Senior Member Technical Staff BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR Office: +1 973.633.6344 email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com |